Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,928   Posts: 1,585,174   Online: 786
      
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: 4.0 or 5.6?

  1. #11
    Christopher Walrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Milton, DE, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,000
    Blog Entries
    29
    Images
    19


    Either in a contact printing frame or, at the very least, a meticulously cleaned pane of glass. Dulled edges of course.
    Thank you.
    CWalrath

    "Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    396
    Quote Originally Posted by Existing Light View Post
    What about contact printing? Would the extra stop be beneficial then?

    Please note that I've never done contact printing. I'm just assuming that you place the negative on top of the paper and line them up under the lens of a regular enlarger. Maybe that's not how it's done, and i'm just dumb
    How to get good contact between the negative and the paper, is a story of its own. (Please search for it, there is plenty of information and I recon, even a subforum here on Apug devoted to it.)
    But when you use the enlarger as a light source, there is a possibility that there is some light fall off at the edges at full opening. Now, "real" contact printers don't use enlargers, only a selection of light bulbs to choose from. Maybe funny, but it's not a joke...

    //Björn

  3. #13
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Central florida,USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,845
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by photomem View Post
    I have always wondered why enlarging lenses open up to f4. Its not like anyone in their right mind would try to print at that aperture.
    It is easier to focus wide open. Stop down for printing.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    florida
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,186
    Images
    2
    I agree with Ralph. I've been printing for over thirty years in various formats. My enlarging lenses vary from f2.8 to f5.6 at their widest openings. I focus wide open on the grain and stop down to f8 or f11 to print. Works fine.
    Jeff

  5. #15
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    If I try to grain focus with any of my enlarging lenses wide open it literally hurts my eyes. And they are mostly f/4 and f/5.6 lenses. I also don't see how to grain focus at the corners with the enlarging lens wide open. Maybe with an apo process lens, but certainly not any of the others that I have used.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  6. #16
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Central florida,USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,845
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by keithwms View Post
    If I try to grain focus with any of my enlarging lenses wide open it literally hurts my eyes. And they are mostly f/4 and f/5.6 lenses. I also don't see how to grain focus at the corners with the enlarging lens wide open. Maybe with an apo process lens, but certainly not any of the others that I have used.
    They are quite bright, you are correct, but no problem focusing into the corners.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  7. #17
    jp80874's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bath, OH 44210 USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,445
    Images
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Existing Light View Post
    What about contact printing? Would the extra stop be beneficial then?

    Please note that I've never done contact printing. I'm just assuming that you place the negative on top of the paper and line them up under the lens of a regular enlarger. Maybe that's not how it's done, and i'm just dumb
    I use a 300mm Rodagon on my 8x10 enlarger for a light source when making 7x17 contact prints in a contact printing frame. I vary the f stop to vary the exposure time. If I need to dodge or burn this give workable times for such activity. It is much harder than d&b in an enlarger because you can not see the image, just guess or calculate relative to the print frame.

    John Powers

  8. #18
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by RalphLambrecht View Post
    ... but no problem focusing into the corners.
    Ralph, by that I meant (as I am sure you know): some enlarging lenses will not be sharp enough to judge the edges when shot wide open. It's not worth going through lens-by-lens here, but... anyone with a grain focuser can look at corner sharpness as a function of aperture.

    From an optical standpoint, it's not obvious to me that the corner focus you establish with the lens wide open will be identical to the corner focus when it is stopped down. Yes, I am saying that the focus may drift with aperture... at least for some glass. This seems very nonintuitive because we focus wide open through our cameras all the time. I don't know if anyone else has seen this effect, but I did see it with some no-name wide enlarging lens at high mag. Generally it's something that we take for granted, that the lens is sufficiently corrected to give consistent focus through all the apertures. And that intuition is mostly correct... I am just saying, beware. When we judge focus, we do so in relative terms... we compare in-focus to out-of-focus. It's not like bells go off when we hit the focus right on, it's always comparative... and thus your eyes can be tricked. At least by some (inferior?) enlarging lenses.

    Of course, the other part of this (and perhaps the more important part in general) is that if the lens is not sharp to the corners when shot wide open then we can unwittingly make some error in determining optimal focus there. So of course... best policy, esp. if you want to enlarge wide open because of shorter times or whatever, is to check multiple points with the grain focuser. And try a few different apertures as well, it may surprise you.

    And of course none of my comments are directed at Ralph, though he may wish to say more...

    ~~~

    Anyway, just a supplementary word of caution that I think is worth repeating, especially for any newcomers to optical enlarging: if you use a grain focuser, do be attentive to the health of your eyeballs! Your eyes, when adjusted to typical darkroom conditions, are quite vulnerable to bright light, such as through a grain focuser with your lens wide open.... photographers need to protect their most valuable faculty! So be patient and give your eyes plenty of time to adjust.... I didn't do this, just once, and had a painful injury for several weeks. I suppose I burned my retina. Hurt like hell, and there is probably some amount of permanent damage. Best policy, I feel, is to stop the lens down to f/16 or so, then open the lens up gradually.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  9. #19
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Central florida,USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,845
    Images
    1
    Keith

    I see no option. I have a terrible time finding the 'sweet' spot of focus, unless the lens is wide open. My enlarger is not bright enough to pose any danger to my eyes, and it has a neutral density filter built-in, should I ever need it. Also, I mainly use a 20x grain magnifier, which is a dimmer instrument then the Peak with its 10x magnification.

    However, your warning is justified and your suggestion is valuable. We need to protect our eyes.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  10. #20
    Martin Aislabie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Stratford-upon-Avon, England
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,413
    Not possessing a ND Filter in the head of my DeVere, I just dialled in 50Y + 50M + 50C

    It meant not only my retinas remained in tact but also I could use sensible f stop settings and exposure times

    I found (by chance) that one of my top name German enlarger lenses focus shifted as it stopped down – which came as a bit of an unpleasant surprise.

    Consequently, I have retired it to paperweight duties

    Martin

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin