Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,331   Posts: 1,537,248   Online: 989
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    74

    Staticmaster—Oh My Goodness!

    I've been using Staticmaster brushes for over a decade as a primary method of controlling dust on negatives. I have found them to be extremely effective. These are the brushes with the radioactive cartridge, and, if you've used them, you know that the cartridge needs to be replaced every couple of years. No big deal. The cartridges for my 1 inch brush cost about $15 (maybe even less) last time I did this.

    My current cartridge expires this month, and I went to the B&H site to check on refills. I was stunned to see that the replacement now sells for $65!! Adorama has it for less, but it's still more than $50! It looks like I'll be hunting for a new way to control static.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,379
    Images
    88
    Keep using it.
    The cartridge in mine expired in 1983. It still works about as well as it did when it was new.
    That is, I never have seen much evidence that they reduce static all that much. YMMV

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    florida
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,165
    Images
    2
    I found similar brushes without the cartridge also in art supply stores you can find brushes with similar bristles. Both have worked fine for me. It's humid don here so static is not an issue.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    284
    bdial - ??? Try using the brush on some static cling packing peanuts. It is pretty obvious when it works and when it is expired. radioactive half-life and all. If yours works for you without the active static-canceling agent then great...your anti-static needs are few.

    Yes, it has gotten expensive which is a major bummer. All kinds of reasons including Hazmat costs.

    I love mine and use it on film, to cancel static cling on chemical prills when mixing up developing ingredients, and to remove any static charge from my .01g scale before taking a reading.

  5. #5
    MikeSeb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Prospect (Louisville), KY, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,062
    I use the Kinetronics brushes that don't have isotopes to degrade away; supposedly "wicks" static away during vigorous brushing. I can't swear that either the Kinetronics or my former Staticmasters do much, but there it is.
    Michael Sebastian
    Website | Blog

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,379
    Images
    88
    I've used fresh and old Staticmasters on static-prone things like records, and not so much static prone like film, and in dry climates and humid climates.
    Your mileage is different, but I've never noticed much of an effect. I like the brushes though.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    74
    You're right about the brush itself, bdial, and I'll no doubt continue using mine for that purpose. Static is a problem here in the winter, and there are times when I've seen some of the dust on a negative just fall off when using the staticmaster. Not all of it does, of course, and I usually find that some light brushing is necessary.

    I do have one of the small (and inexpensive) Kinetronics brushes, which I haven't found to be effective.

  8. #8
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,241
    Images
    20
    The 4" Kinetronics brush works well for me. I use it on negs, glass neg carriers, printing frames, vinyl LPs, lenses, and all sorts of things. It can be washed periodically as well.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    192
    I've been using an old Discwasher Zerostat "gun," designed for use on LP records. Seems to do the trick.

  10. #10
    Mike Wilde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Misissauaga Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,939
    Images
    29
    I leave water in my print washer and a cheapo air filter unit running to keep the air moving to encourage some humidity in my darkroom in the winter; it is better than nothing, and a cheap way to counter winter dry air and static zaps, in addition to helping to keep the dust under control. Once in a while the print washer gets a blast of dilute bleach and a run to cahnge it's water to keep the growies under control that otherwsie start in stagnant water.
    my real name, imagine that.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin