Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,299   Posts: 1,535,786   Online: 713
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    60

    Changing enlarger power. Recommendations needed.

    I have a lpl 7700 vcce enlarger who uses a 100w 12v halogen bulb.
    We all know that halogen light is less effective in order to print on vc papers due to its spectral sensibility and my printing times are very high.
    Then I have to options to look for a cold light head, and I think it is nothing avalaible for this enlarger, or to rise its light power.
    I have no knowledge on electronics but I think its not as easy as change the bulb to a bigger one, sure you have to change more things on the enlarger.
    Any advice?
    Thanks.
    Last edited by makanakijones; 02-05-2010 at 05:45 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago, Western Suburbs
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,436
    Dear makanakijones,

    My Chromega Dichroic uses a halogen light source and it prints quite nicely. While the bulb wattage is much higher (250W), I normally have to use the lower brightness setting when printing (this is just a piece of metal with holes in it that blocks some if the light from the bulb). Having said that, when my bulb is near the end of its life it does become much dimmer. You may be able to solve your problems with a new bulb.

    Neal Wydra

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    60
    Hi Neal.
    It is not a bulb age problem. I have tried several new bulbs.

  4. #4
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,182
    Diffuse tungsten halogen light is the ideal source for B&W printing, especially VC printing.

    Cold cathode lamps and LEDs each have a plethora of issues (that can be overcome with technology and $$) limiting their usefulness

    Switching from a VCCE head to a cold-cathode head for VC printing will lead to many large dents in your walls (from banging your head....)

    Any VCCE head is very inefficient because 1) Light mixing boxes (required for the dichroic filters) are inefficient and 2) nearly all the settings will have neutral density added.

    Is 100W what that enlarger head calls for? That seems like a low number.
    Also, see the recent thread on enlarger lamp intensity. Not all 100W bulbs are created equal.
    Last edited by ic-racer; 02-05-2010 at 08:07 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    South Norfolk, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,874
    Images
    62
    ic-racer,

    The Meopta Magnifax 4a Colour 3 head uses a 100W bulb and I tend to have exposures around 10-30 seconds, say 20 seconds for a 12x12" print from a 6x6 neg using an 80mm lens @ f/8 on ILFORD MGIV.

    Tom

  6. #6
    Jon Shiu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Elk, California
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    2,525
    Images
    33
    I have the same enlarger, but called Saunders/LPL 670 VCCE, and get normal exposures ie 30-45 seconds @ 11x14, stopped down a 2-3 stops from medium format on Ilford MVIV FB.

    Jon
    Mendocino Coast Black and White Photography: www.jonshiu.com

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Valley Stream, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,216
    I'm completely in agreement with the others who have already stated that a diffuse halogen lamp is perfectly satisfactory for printing onto variable contrast papers. In fact, I prefer using my Chomega II over a condenser setup. I don't think your problems lie there, and before you go out and buy a cold cathode lamp consider this. The color temperature of some of these units is not at all satisfactory for VC papers. That can be fixed by adding filters into the light path, but that will only decrease the light output. Cold cathode lamps are florescent tubes, and they require a warm up time before the light output stabilizes. Yes there are compensating timers and lamp heaters out there designed to combat these problems, but they are costly and probably don't work as well as you might believe. Tungsten and tungsten halogen lamps are perfect for the application. Close a switch and they light up. Open the switch and they turn off. Ramp up and cool down times are insignificant.

    To Neal, yes I need to have that attenuator in place too. Sometimes, though very rarely, even with the attenuator in place, exposure times can be too short with the Chromega II to accomplish any dodging and burning moves with any accuracy unless I stop the lens all the way down - something I don't like to do. At times like that I've had to insert ND filtration into the light path just to slow it down.
    Frank Schifano

  8. #8
    paul_c5x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ye Olde England
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,451
    Images
    23
    When I had an LPL C7700 enlarger, my typical exposure times were around 10 seconds at f11 (from memory). I would expect the VC head to have similar characteristics.

    Putting a higher wattage lamp in is inadvisable as there is a real risk that the head would overheat. If you have changed the lamp and found no real difference, I'd suggest checking the voltage from the transformer (PSU) and also the condition of the mixer box.

  9. #9
    ath
    ath is offline
    ath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    890
    Check if it is the correct bulb type. Not all bulbs that fit physically and have 12V 100W are suitable. It has to be the type EFP.
    Regards,
    Andreas

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,044
    Quote Originally Posted by makanakijones View Post
    We all know that halogen light is less effective in order to print on vc papers due to its spectral sensibility and my printing times are very high.

    Thanks.
    If halogen is inefficient what that make tungsten?
    I didn't realize until now that halogen wasn't effective and suspect that a cold light will be far less effective.
    Heavily sedated for your protection.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin