Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,933   Posts: 1,585,478   Online: 938
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    hoffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,967
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    57

    50mm Enlarging lenses - which one to keep, which one to sell

    Howdy,

    I recently bought a bulk lot (LPL-C7700 enlarger, 2 lenses, trays, lights, etc).

    The lenses that came in the lot were both Nikkor F4 lenses at 50mm and 75mm. I currently also have a Rodegon 50mm F2.8. Apart from being a little dusty, the Nikkors look in good condition.

    Out of the two 50's that I have, which would be better? My untrained eye can't really tell that much difference TBH.

    Cheers

  2. #2
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,438
    Images
    148
    Test them, they should both be excellent lenses. My preference would be to keep the Rodagon because it's a stop faster.

    Ian

  3. #3
    hoffy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,967
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    57
    That was my thoughts as well.....Will get right into both of them tonight.

    Cheers

  4. #4
    ozphoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,138
    Images
    1
    I'd choose the Rodagon as well. Have one in my LPL 7700 and it works a treat!
    But as Ian pointed out, would be a good idea to test them both before deciding.

  5. #5
    André E.C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Finland
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,520
    Images
    12
    Keep that 6 elements Rodagon, those 4 element Nikkors (your 75mm is also the same Tessar design) were made in the 60's as budget lenses, they are great performers stop down (f/8) at the center, yet nothing special at the corners.
    All this only being evident if you print larger, on a typical 8x10 size, the difference is barely noticeable.

    So, hold on that Rodenstock!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma, USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    681
    I planed to improve the 50mm enlarging lenses at a community darkroom where I instruct. Using f/8 and projecting to 7x10.5 inches, I checked center against edge. I found little difference between the Schneider Componar (3 element) vs my Leitz Focotar f/4.5. A new Fuji f/3.5 was a tad behind. I'm surprised at the results but it was at f/8.
    RJ

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma, USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    681
    I might add that under a grain focus device you can see a crisper image with the Focotar vis Componar. Can't go wrong with a 6 element lens.
    RJ



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin