Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,700   Posts: 1,549,204   Online: 1194
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,236
    Quote Originally Posted by ath View Post
    Yes, but it doesn't seem to matter that much with this specific enlarger.
    Might be the big illuminated area of the frosted bulb in contrary to a point source.
    You are right, that indeed could be the case. Most "condenser" enlargers are somewhere between a perfectly collimated point source and a diffusion source. So, on the LPL the focus of the condensers may not be super critical.

    I guess most important is to check various combinations of the condensers and see which combination actually is the most even under your conditions.

    I high contrast print with no negative can be very revealing

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    OH
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,789
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by shmalec View Post
    I had a look last night and there does seem to be some slight fall off using the 50mm lens. However, it is a very small, cheap, plasticy looking Besler 50mm f3.5 lens.
    This is obviously academic if you have an 80mm lens that you can use and gives you sufficient enlargement, but your 50mm lens might be at fault. Were you trying this at full aperture?

    Also academic, but isn't the point of the condensers to evenly illuminate the negative? Even a blank negative should add a fair amount of diffusion to the optical path. I would think that would more or less interfere with any optimization of the condensers to match them to the lens-to-negative distance and projecting lens focal length.

  3. #13
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,236
    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Gray View Post
    This is obviously academic if you have an 80mm lens that you can use and gives you sufficient enlargement, but your 50mm lens might be at fault. Were you trying this at full aperture?

    Also academic, but isn't the point of the condensers to evenly illuminate the negative? Even a blank negative should add a fair amount of diffusion to the optical path. I would think that would more or less interfere with any optimization of the condensers to match them to the lens-to-negative distance and projecting lens focal length.
    You are thinking of a diffusion head. Condensers produce collimated light in which it is focusing an image of the top of the bulb down toward the lens with most of the rays traveling in the same direction. If the enlarging lens (or the bulb) is not in the correct position then many of the light rays bypass the lens and the effect is dimness. If you put a diffusing screen above the negative, you have now evened out the light so any lens position is OK but it now is much much dimmer because the rays are scattered about.

    A clear piece of negative film will allow essentially all collimated rays to pass through in their original direction and is not a diffuser.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    OH
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,789
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by ic-racer View Post
    A clear piece of negative film will allow essentially all collimated rays to pass through in their original direction and is not a diffuser.
    This was the part I was curious about. While clear film does is clear, it definitely does diffuse the light some. However you are right - not enough to really make a difference.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin