Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,826   Posts: 1,582,045   Online: 757
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Poland, a Osiek near Oswiecim
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    80

    Bulk loader & Durst M605

    Hello,

    I have a two questions.

    1.

    What bulk loader will be better?
    a.) http://www.freestylephoto.biz/273262...tic?cat_id=702

    b.) http://www.freestylephoto.biz/63000-...der?cat_id=701

    2.
    A Durst M605 is good enlarger for 35mm and 6x6 ?
    This ELR have a 7,5x7,5 cm MG/VC Filters?
    And for this enlarger I have a Schneider-Kreuzach COMPONON-S 50mm f/2.8 .

    Cheers, / Pozdrawiam
    Konrad

  2. #2
    fotch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE WI- USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,223
    I used many years ago the Lloyd loader, its works, and have heard others say the Bobinquick is really good. Myself, i like and use the Watson loader and like them the best. Durst enlargers, for the most part, are all fairly good.
    Items for sale or trade at www.Camera35.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,552
    Images
    90
    The Lloyd loader has a felt light-trap, which can introduce scratches if it's dirty. I'm not familiar with the Bobinquick loader, I don't know what it uses.
    The Watson loader Fotch referred to uses a mechanical light trap, and nothing touches the film when you are spooling it into the cassette.

    The M605 only does 35 and 6x6, however, it is a nice enlarger if you're working with those formats. It is compact, and easy to take down/set up if you don't have a permanent space. I do everyting on a 4x5 but I keep my M605 in the closet "just in case".

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Valley Stream, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,216
    I have at least 1/2 dozen of the Lloyd's loaders. Yes, they use a felt light trap. No, they don't scratch film. Never had it happen yet and I've been using at least one of them for 40 years. A bit of very low tack painters masking tape takes care of any grit that MIGHT get caught in the felt. The Watson loader uses a light trap similar to that used in the Alden 74 loader. I have a few of those too. They're ok, but I like the Lloyd's best. If you're careful with the Lloyd's you can get away with very little waste lost to fogged leaders and trailers.
    Frank Schifano

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Central OK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    208
    I can't give any advice on the loaders mentioned, but I do use an Watson Loader, which I purchased second-hand. It works like a champ.

    It is similar to what is pictured here . . . http://www.flickr.com/photos/mpclemens/3421533259/

  6. #6
    fotch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE WI- USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,223
    I don't recall any scratch problems with the Lloyd but I guess it could happen. As far as losing frames, you can start and end the process with the lights out or in a changing bag. If your using really high quality film, each frame you save is worth a nickel, I think you can save maybe 2?



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin