Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,203   Posts: 1,531,639   Online: 1139
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    39

    Developing a fully automatic film processor kit?

    Hey, guys,

    This is a project that I have been mulling over it for sometime, and I want to bounce the idea off you guys: making a fully automatic desktop, phototherm sidekick style film processor kit, open source manner.

    What sparked off the idea was the fact that the only e6 lab in Singapore no longer processes 4x5 trans. This really sucks. As I began to think about how to do by myself, I faced the same challenge every hobbyist have with c41 and e6 processing : a multi step process that requires close temperature tolerances. Kits like job's cpe/cpa/cpp are very expensive, and it doesn't help to know that the jobo factory has closed down several years ago. Phototherm's Sidekick is a great, but it's expensive, and even if I get hold of a used unit, the shipping cost to Singapore would probably double the acquisition cost.

    As I break down the problem in my head, I think it's totally possible to build a fully automatic desktop processor for a few hundred bucks. There are a few parts to the challenge:

    1. An agitation system. Rolling the entire tank is one way, but the system can be made simpler if just the spindle rotates.

    2. A set of fluid control system that pumps in the chemicals and drains them out. There are many automatic cocktail mixers built by hobbyists around the world that have solved this part.

    3. A temperature bath. This is easy - a temperature sensor, an heating element, and you are pretty much set.

    4. A microprocessor to orchestrate the whole set up. An Arduino UNO cost around $30. The Arduino appeals to me because of my software background. An competent electronics engineer can definitely use a cheaper alternative with a bit of self designed circuits.

    I begin to think that a low cost, fully automatic, home use processor might just be the single most important key to extend the life of analog photography - especially color photography! With both professional and minilabs shutting their doors, there are people that are forced to give up, or feel intimidated, to continue shooting film.

    Any of you interested to help the electronics novice here with the project? I'm thinking of putting the entire schematics, and codes on the Internet, to invite the more experienced hobbyists to refine the design. If there are sufficient interests, we can also put up preassembled kits for sale, to help people who do not have the time or skills to build the kits from the drawings. There might be some custom fabricated parts that can be made cheaper if there are more people that want this. Theres probably not much money to be made from this, and that's not the goal either - it's just to scratch an itch that I, and probably many of you, have.

    What do you think? Or perhaps you have already made one of these? And how much would you be willing to pay for one such preassembled kits?

  2. #2
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,233
    Images
    60
    You may want to review this thread, and the links in it:

    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum43/8...processor.html

    Maybe you could collaborate.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    560
    You also have to consider your tanks. Jobo tanks are the most modular since they can do 35mm,120 and 4x5 all in the same tank. If you decide on Jobo tanks it's going to be pretty tempting just to get a used CPE-2 for $200. A home built system is going to cost the same and require more effort. Making your own tanks is not trivial and reels even less so.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    120
    Images
    4
    Jobo tanks also have a clear advantage in that they take a lot less chemicals as they lie flat and rotate. This has enormous cost savings.

    Designing a cog/motor to drive a Jobo tank should be simple. Adding a controller and water bath would be trivial.


    But don't underestimate the design of Jobo's - they have been around for a long time because they work very well. Learn from that.

  5. #5
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,054
    The Jobo ATL-2 already meets your need. You will spend more money and effort reinventing the wheel than if you buy the Jobo ATL-2.

    Steve
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,342
    Images
    58
    I think his point is that he WANTS to re-invent the wheel because they aren't making any more wheels.

  7. #7
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,054
    They are available for purchase. One only has to look. For example contact joboman@aol.com. I picked up a Jobo CPP-2 with a 1540 tank and all the bottles and graduates for much less than the eBay prices. I bought a Jobo 3010 Expert Tank from FreeStyle. If the OP posted his/her location, someone in APUG could help find local sellers.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    604
    The op implied he was in Singapore. Or at least the lab he cares about is.

    Quote Originally Posted by losheng View Post
    What sparked off the idea was the fact that the only e6 lab in Singapore no longer processes 4x5 trans.

  9. #9
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,054
    That could affect availability.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  10. #10
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,828
    Images
    29
    I believe that the time is slowly coming when the rest of the world outside the USA and Germany, will start looking for something either semi automated, or perhaps fully automated, capable of developing film from 135 through to 8x10" with 135 being the biggest throughput then 4x5" being next with 120 and 8x10" last.

    The ability to use Jobo tanks, or an extremely similar set of tanks and maybe Hewes stainless reels for the smaller formats and the Jobo big tanks for the sheet film if so desired.

    In short, the biggest market will be for 135, 120 and 4x5" film.

    I believe within 5 years my Jobo's will be starting to fail, if not fail before.

    Mick.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin