Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,926   Posts: 1,585,076   Online: 870
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    nhemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    NJ - Near NYC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    200
    Images
    22

    Metal binding - a question for the chemically inclined.

    I read an article in the NYT a bit ago about how they are using fish bone meal to bind up lead in soil into compounds that cannot be absorbed by the body. It got me thinking if this would be applicable to some of the chemicals/metals used in the darkroom. Unfortunately, my chemistry is nowhere near what it should be to answer that question myself - I'm just a lowly marine engineer

    The article:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/21/sc...l?pagewanted=2
    "There is no such thing as objective reality in a photograph"

    My flickr and (gasp!) dpug photos - take a look if you like.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,301
    Silver is a lot easier to recover from fixer that mining it. No need to neutralize it.
    Bob

  3. #3
    nhemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    NJ - Near NYC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    200
    Images
    22
    I was never so worried about silver - the value drives its own recovery proceses and there are plenty of outlets, even if its just another person with a recovery unit. I'm especially thinking about less desirable metals like selenium and other intensifier/toners. Or for that matter just some of the more noxious beasties that could be bound up and essentially inerted.

    The extreme example, though obviously not applicable, would be the vitrification of reactor material to stabilize it for long term storage.
    "There is no such thing as objective reality in a photograph"

    My flickr and (gasp!) dpug photos - take a look if you like.

  4. #4
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,552
    Images
    65
    The only heavy metals in films or papers are Osmium, Rhodium and Iridium. They are present at about 10^-6 moles per mole of silver, and the silver is present at about 300 mg / foot square in a high speed B&W film. So, there is no big worry about the film or paper.

    Selenium is a problem, of course as are gold toners and some other toners. If there are concerns, they must be disposed of as hazardous waste in compliance with local regulations. Silver in the fixer is not a big problem as it can be recovered.

    PE

  5. #5
    nhemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    NJ - Near NYC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    200
    Images
    22
    Hi PE,

    I was hoping you would chime in sooner or later - to speak to my original point, would it be possible to do what they did in the article? i.e bind up the typical photography metals in such a way to render them essentially inert?
    I realize it might be an academic question in the end but my curiosity was piqued when I read it.
    neil
    Last edited by nhemann; 07-24-2011 at 04:23 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    "There is no such thing as objective reality in a photograph"

    My flickr and (gasp!) dpug photos - take a look if you like.

  6. #6
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23,552
    Images
    65
    Well, at the end of the process, all Silver ions are bound up in the fixer, or washed out in the wash.

    About all you can do is reclaim the Silver as metal via electrolysis or precipitate it out as the Hydroxide. One is easy and the the other is complex. The easy one is by electrolysis and the simplest is just throwing a chunk of steel wool into the fixer. However, this too begs the issue by replacing Silver with Iron. In the final analysis (pun intended) you end up replacing one chemical with another in all of these and local laws may be the final controlling factor.

    PE

  7. #7
    Mike Wilde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Misissauaga Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,939
    Images
    29
    Read up on the sequestering properties of EDTA if you are interested in one way that heavy metals are extracted from those who have absorbed too much. I beleive the term is 'chelating agent'.
    my real name, imagine that.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin