Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,930   Posts: 1,585,401   Online: 1007
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,196
    Images
    6

    Is a 150mm enlarger lens enough to cover 5x7 negatives?

    I'm thinking of converting my Beseler 45MX into a 5x7 enlarger. Will my 150mm El Nikor lens cover a 5x7 negative? Thanks in advance!

  2. #2
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,392
    Only for small enlargements. Look for a 210.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    448
    The 180mm EL-Nikkor is also good for 5x7. I'm not sure about other makers' 180s, but some Nikon literature I have claims this one works for 5x7.

  4. #4
    outwest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    320
    Images
    3
    The old 150mm EL-Nikkor that uses the 53mm flange mounting will - at least mine does on my Omega E with an extended cone.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    56
    You may have to get an 8x10 conversion kit to cover the 5x7 format and yes a 210mm would be necessary to get full coverage on a 5x7 negative!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    674
    Using enlarging lenses for larger negatives than they were designed for sometimes “works” after a fashion at smaller print sizes. I’ve “cheated by using a 75/4 EL Nikkor to make 8” x 10” prints from 6 x 7cm negatives, but I can’t increase the magnification much larger before the corners darken too much or get cut off.

    The original 150/5.6 and the newer 150/5.6A EL Nikkors are specifically made as 4” x 5” format lenses. At smaller print sizes the lens might “see” the entire image rectangle and project it onto enlarging paper, but the quality of the projection of the corner region of the negative might lack the definition demanded for excellence. The corners might also display some light falloff as print size is increased.

    According to the Nikon data I have, the original 150/5.6 projects 54 degrees and will cover a negative of up to 190mm diagonal.

    The newer 150/5.6A (f = 149.6mm) projects 51 degrees and covers a maximum film diagonal of 180mm.

    The diagonal of the image rectangle of a 5” x 7” negative is about 210mm, but can vary depending on the dimensions of the film window for a particular make of film holder.

    You could try the lens you have to see if makes acceptable prints at the magnification you want. The 180mm and 210mm EL Nikkors (both versions) are specifically designed as 5” x 7” enlarging lenses and will make excellent enlargements over their intended 2X-4X(optimum)-8X magnification range. Most lenses of 180mm to 210mm are designed for the 5” x 7” format.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Med. Format Pan
    Posts
    356
    go for 210 or 300mm

    I am building an enlarger for 6x17mm panoramas with a 300mm lens and it works wonderfully--- these negs are 7 inches long.
    * Just because your eyes are closed, doesn't mean the lights in the darkroom are off. *
    * When the film you put in the camera is worth more than the camera you put the film in... *
    * When I started using 8x10, it amazed me how many shots were close to the car. *

  8. #8
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,196
    Images
    6
    Here's a picture of a 5x7 conversion. The box seems to be a manufactured product.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5x7_conversion1.jpg 
Views:	34 
Size:	132.7 KB 
ID:	42361

  9. #9
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,392
    Here is a 210mm Eskofot Ultragon for $48. It would make a fantastic enlarging lens. I have a 305 Eskofot I occasionally use for 8x10 enlarging.

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ad.php?t=83784

  10. #10
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,196
    Images
    6
    Never heard of the lens before until now. Since its a process lens, I would think its sharp. It's used for process cameras in the printing industry right?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin