Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 75,675   Posts: 1,669,125   Online: 1104
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36
  1. #21
    bvy
    bvy is online now

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,247
    Images
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by Prof_Pixel View Post
    I consider instant photography to be in the 'point and shoot' digital image category; not intended for 'Serious Photography'.
    I hope never to turn into a "serious" photographer...

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Penfield, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,198
    Quote Originally Posted by RattyMouse View Post
    Let's see: ... flash is on 100% of the time
    The last few versions of the Kodak Instant Cameras were flash every time. Film contrast was a little high and adding full time fill-in flash greatly improved image quality.

  3. #23
    Fixcinater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Shooter
    127 Format
    Posts
    1,573
    Images
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by RattyMouse View Post
    Looks like I have 3 choices for instant cameras.

    1. The new Instax Neo. Pros: finally a serious camera from Fujifilm. Cons: Small images. No monochrome.
    2. Instax 210. Pros: Nice sized photographs. Great color. Cons: A joke of a camera, no monochrome.
    3. A Polaroid Land camera: Pros: both color and monochrome. Good image size. Cons: Old camera, hard to find in China, questionable reliability.

    Tough call.....each option has an appeal to me.
    You could also shoot instant in a "serious" camera. Peel-apart Fuji in my Speed Graphic is a lot of fun, and a lot easier than stuffing Instax into 4x5 holders individually.

  4. #24
    Theo Sulphate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    az USA-ban
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    502
    To me, neither the equipment nor the film define "serious" photography; rather it is the intent of the photographer and the images produced.

    In 2006 I was in Yosemite and had my SX-70 with me. I made a photo of El Capitan and of Half Dome that impressed me with the creaminess and tone of the colors - right then I knew I had two keepers (which I later scanned and enlarged to 8x10). These two are among my very favorite photos that I've made over the last 30 years with various formats and media. I suppose if I'd used 35mm, or whatever - even digital, I might be able to tweak the results to look similar -- but I knew the shots had an amazing look right after I took them.
    Nikon: F, F2, F2, F2, F2S, F2S, F3/T, F3/T, F4S, F4S, FM, FM3a, D700
    Canon: EF, AE-1P, RebelG, RebelG, RebelG, Elan 7NE, QL17GIII, Canonet 28
    Leica: M3, M3, M6, M6
    Exakta: VX, VX, VX,, VXIIa
    Hasselblad: 500C/M, 501C, SWC, 553ELX
    Mamiya: RB67 Pro S, RB67 ProS
    Fuji: GW690III, X-Pro1
    Polaroid: SX-70, SLR 690, Image 1200
    Minolta: SRT-101, Maxxum 7, DiMAGE X1
    Minox: III, IIIs, IIIs, B
    Graflex: Pacemaker 4x5
    Olympus: XA, XA2
    Other: Pentax SP500, Ricoh GR1, Voigtländer Bessamatic

  5. #25
    rubyfalls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    171
    Ratty - did you ever snag an instant camera? I got my oldest a 250 land camera for his birthday and loved his shots so much I found a 360 for myself but am having some issues with it.

  6. #26
    M Carter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    587
    Polaroid Polagraph 400. Miss it terribly.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Kristen 3.jpg  

  7. #27
    Mainecoonmaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,517
    Images
    6
    Marie Consindas and Andy Warhol has been doing serious work. When I shot professionally back in the day, I only use Polaroid to proof for the "real" film. I'm not Consindas nor Warhol, but Polaroids by them are precious art objects.

    http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/...rie-consindas/
    “We are buried beneath the weight of information, which is being confused with knowledge; quantity is being confused with abundance and wealth with happiness.
    We are monkeys with money and guns.”

    ― Tom Waits

  8. #28
    one90guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Texas Gulf Coast
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    376
    I like the Polaroid 100, metal body and tripod ready. Do a battery conversion and the only problem is you will occasionally find one with a bad electronic board easy to make a pin hole camera out of those. clean the rollers, and start shooting. The 110 a and B's are the Cadillac's. The only tools I use are a hacksaw and file, mine may not be as pretty as the pro's conversations but they work great. Only problem is finding the camera for a decent price with a good lens, then get a back, I have even used backs from the 100's, a lot more work testing and fitting. Plus lots of information to be found on line.
    David
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell

  9. #29
    aRolleiBrujo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    752

  10. #30
    aRolleiBrujo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    752
    Last edited by aRolleiBrujo; 08-23-2014 at 12:29 AM. Click to view previous post history.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin