Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,931   Online: 923
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Dan Quan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    94
    Images
    1

    A Little Help Calculating Working Distance, Please.

    I am considering a lens purchase for still life close-up work, but I can't seem to find the formula to calculate working distance when I know the magnification and focal length and bellows draw, a formula I did find. I presume there is such a formula and I am hoping one of you will point me in the right direction or post it.

    Caveat: I am not a math person, I struggled through Algebra, several times.
    DanQuan.com
    stand in the place where you are

  2. #2
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,192
    Images
    58
    Dan:

    IIRC, any such formula would only tell you the working distance:

    1) from the lens, if the lens was a simple meniscus lens; or
    2) from the nodal point, which depending on the type of lens being used, could be inside the lens, in front of front element of the lens, or behind the rear element of the lens.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  3. #3
    Dan Quan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    94
    Images
    1
    I appreciate your quick response.

    I'm considering a G-Claron or an Artar, and I may be able to find the nodal point info for those.
    DanQuan.com
    stand in the place where you are

  4. #4
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New York, New York
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    16,370
    Images
    20
    Or you can just use what's conventional for 8x10" (assuming from your profile info that that's the format you're shooting), which would be about 19" or 480mm if you have the bellows draw to shoot still life with a 19" lens (you'll probably want around 40", which is a pretty long bellows). For practical purposes, if you want to maximize working distance with the camera you have, start from the maximum bellows draw, and pick the lens that gives you the maximum magnification you need with the bellows draw you have, and then you just have to deal with the working distance or get a camera with a longer bellows.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  5. #5
    Dan Quan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    94
    Images
    1
    Hi David, Thanks for posting. I do have a 19" RDA and a Kodak Copying Ektanon 16 3/4 “, but only 30" of bellows draw and I want to shoot some really small stuff, peppers, flowers etc. So I am thinking of a 305, 270, 210 ish but I want to have room to light the subject as well. I need some idea of the working distance these offer so I can guess-timate my lighting requirements.
    DanQuan.com
    stand in the place where you are

  6. #6
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    3,493
    Dan,

    the general equation is

    1/f = 1/w + 1/v

    where:
    f is the focal length
    w is the distance from lens to object (roughly what you call working distance)
    v is the distance from lens to film plane (image distance)

    so, for example,
    if your focal length is 305mm and your bellows is 700mm (~27 inches) then

    1/f = 1/w + 1/v
    1/305 = 1/w + 1/700
    1/w = 1/305 - 1/700
    and so,
    w = 1/( (1/305) - (1/700) )
    and when I punch this into my trusty pocket calculator, I get...
    working distance = 540.506 mm (~21.3 inches)

    (EDIT: the two distances v and w are actually from the nodal point of the lens. This can be assumed to be roughly at the lens board for lenses that are not telephoto nor wide angle).
    Last edited by BradS; 01-10-2012 at 09:53 PM.

  7. #7
    Dan Quan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    94
    Images
    1
    Oh, I get by with a little help from my friends...


    DanQuan.com
    stand in the place where you are

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    502
    I presume that you mean working distance = lens-to-subject distance.

    Let s = the subject distance (from the optical center of the lens to the subject)

    f = focal length of the lens

    m = magnification

    E = total extension = f + b, where b = displacement of the lens forward of its infinity focus position

    As a function of m and f

    s = (m + 1)f/m


    Example: f = 100mm, m = 1X. Then

    s = (1 + 1)100mm/1 = 200mm


    As a function of E and f

    s = Ef/(E – f)

    Example E = 200mm (b = 100mm), f = 100mm

    s = 200mm*100mm/(200mm – 100mm) = 200mm


    You could also calculate the distance from the film plane to the subject if you find it more practical.

  9. #9
    Dan Quan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    94
    Images
    1
    Thanks Ian, I appreciate your response and I am sure it makes perfect sense to the smart people. I however, (frequently boasting of an IQ in the high double digits) needed something I could just plug into my TI-83 Plus, hit enter, smile with satisfaction and move onto my next task.

    I appreciate the effort it takes to answer questions and everyones contribution. Thanks so much.

    BradS, thanks for spelling it out, that really made it work for me.
    DanQuan.com
    stand in the place where you are

  10. #10
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    3,493
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Quan View Post
    BradS, thanks for spelling it out, that really made it work for me.
    My sincere pleasure. I always wanted to "be a Math teacher when I grow up".....somehow that never happened. No regrets though.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin