|
|
|
-
-
Very cool. I'm not an 8x10 photographer (or a large format one) but it's always cool to see stuff like this. I think the "ordinary" 14" Heliar is the one that I liked the most consistently.
-
And next the cleaning ladies?
We see lots of Tonopah cars, so the Tonopah cleaning ladies LF portraits will be a good addition
John
Quinninup
-
Thanks for the comparison I thought I'd never would say that but I overall prefer the look of the Euryscope to the Heliar.
Dominik
-
 Originally Posted by jbaphoto
And next the cleaning ladies?
We see lots of Tonopah cars, so the Tonopah cleaning ladies LF portraits will be a good addition
John
Quinninup
Might need a wide angle for them. I pretty much suck at portraiture. Every once in a while I get lucky. Just noticed. There's a self portrait in the final image on page 3. That's about as good as it gets. Thanks John.
Thanks Dominik. Magic how that Euryscop lights up the shadows.
Last edited by jimgalli; 01-16-2012 at 06:10 PM.
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
Jim,
Beautiful work as always! Great subject too. Love those lenses, amazing the difference between the 'normal' Heliar and the Portrait Euryscop! Tonal range is just . . . different.
On a slightly different subject, I have a question for you, and others who wish to chime in.
I have a few 'big' lenses, including a 14"/4.5 Pinkham Bi-Quality. I bought a big (and HEAVY) Linhof Color-Kardan, + a big Packard shutter, etc. a while back to use the big lenses.
Now, I'm considering selling the Linhof as well as a Kodak 2-D, and wondering if I can mount and use these lenses on a Sinar Norma 8x10? Lens board seems big enough . . .
Thoughts?
Cheers
Robb Scharetg
-
 Originally Posted by Robb Scharetg
Jim,
Beautiful work as always! Great subject too. Love those lenses, amazing the difference between the 'normal' Heliar and the Portrait Euryscop! Tonal range is just . . . different.
On a slightly different subject, I have a question for you, and others who wish to chime in.
I have a few 'big' lenses, including a 14"/4.5 Pinkham Bi-Quality. I bought a big (and HEAVY) Linhof Color-Kardan, + a big Packard shutter, etc. a while back to use the big lenses.
Now, I'm considering selling the Linhof as well as a Kodak 2-D, and wondering if I can mount and use these lenses on a Sinar Norma 8x10? Lens board seems big enough . . .
Thoughts?
Cheers
Robb Scharetg
Kodak 2D is the ticket. A 6 1/2" Packard can live inside the Kodak. Not pretty, or impressive, but always gets the job done........at least for me. Plus it's also the lightest solution in weight.
-
Big on Norma
 Originally Posted by Robb Scharetg
Jim,
Beautiful work as always! Great subject too. Love those lenses, amazing the difference between the 'normal' Heliar and the Portrait Euryscop! Tonal range is just . . . different.
On a slightly different subject, I have a question for you, and others who wish to chime in.
I have a few 'big' lenses, including a 14"/4.5 Pinkham Bi-Quality. I bought a big (and HEAVY) Linhof Color-Kardan, + a big Packard shutter, etc. a while back to use the big lenses.
Now, I'm considering selling the Linhof as well as a Kodak 2-D, and wondering if I can mount and use these lenses on a Sinar Norma 8x10? Lens board seems big enough . . .
Thoughts?
Cheers
Robb Scharetg
Here is a pic of a 36cm Heliar on a Norma with the lens pushed away from the front standard by an LPL mouse-trap (rat-trap) shutter, which will go as soon as I find a Heliar lens flange - There is need to push the lens away so it clears the Sinar Shutter

The front standard does not slip even when a bit of forward lens tilt is used - No Jim, you have got too many already!!!!
Last edited by John Austin; 01-17-2012 at 02:49 AM.
Reason: spelling and clarity
-
Great lenses. I generally preferred the look of the 14" Heliar.
-
Mark Barendt, Ignacio, CO
My aspiration of late is to become more Bohemian; "a person with artistic or intellectual tendencies, who lives and acts with no regard for conventional rules of behavior."
|
|