Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,931   Online: 918
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,740
    Images
    5

    Schneider 120mm 5.6 Apo Symmar XL or 110mm 5.6 Super Symmar Aspheric

    Ok, so they are very close in focal length, and both pretty small lenses.

    Super Symmar Pros vs Apo-Symmar:

    1) Huge image circle, which would allow generous movements on 4x5 vs the Apo Symmar

    Super Symmar Cons vs Apo-Symmar:

    1) More distortion since not symmetric? Not sure. The graphs look like it has slightly more distortion than the Apo-Symmar.

    2) 2x the price just for the lens, PLUS a center filter!!

    I do a fair amount of straight-on urban shots, architecture etc, so the room for significant front rise could potentially be quite useful, but the cost is enormous, and distortion could be an issue.

  2. #2
    LJH
    LJH is offline

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    165
    The 120mm is not made for 4x5" (if that's what you're shooting). There is conflicting information on its coverage for this format. I wouldn't bother with it.

    Also, with the 110mm on 4x5, you probably won't need the cf. And the distortion will be at the edges; you'll need some massive movements to get to this on 4x5.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    135
    The 120mm XL covers 4x5 with ease. Sure it was made for 4x5, it just doesn't offer a huge image circle so there is not so much room for movements, though some movements can be made. It offers suberb imagery, excellent tones and sharpness. I used it for several images in my b&w landscape section:
    www.frankbunnik.zenfolio.com

    Good luck with your choice, Frank

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,740
    Images
    5
    Ok, so one vote for the Super Symmar, one vote for the Apo Symmar. So I'm back where I started

    I'm surprised by LJH's post though - Schneider certainly claims the 120 is good for 4x5.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    135
    For 4x5 you will probably not need the center-filter on the 110mm lens. If you need a large image circle, why not look for a wide-angle lens in the 105 - 120mm range? These are a lot cheaper than the 110mm lens.

    After my previous post I noticed that the technical details to the 120mm photos on my site were missing so I just corrected that.

    Good luck with your choice, Frank
    www.frankbunnik.zenfolio.com

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,740
    Images
    5
    Thanks for the clarification.

    Actually 120mm is the focal length I'd most like to have as it fits in nicely between a 150 and 90, and is the equivalent of a ~35mm in the 35mm format, which is one of my favourite angles of view.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    135
    I understand.

    I see you are in Montreal so I checked Keh. They have several lenses of 120mm for sale, including several Nikon and Schneider wide-angle versions. These cover 5x7 so they will give you plenty of movement with 4x5.

    They also have 2 Fuji 125mm lenses. The difference with 120mm is negligible but the size of the lens will be smaller than a wide-angle lens.

    http://www.keh.com/Camera/format-Lar...c=55942&r=WG&f

    all the best, Frank



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin