Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 55,924   Posts: 1,148,044   Online: 678
      
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,658
    I described my paper cutting setup on the LF forum. For a cutter I used a smaller paper cutter. The thing is basically just the cutting part of the one you used and not much outside of that. I had intially planned to mount it to a wooden board with screws but when I got it home the molded plastic made it clear that trying to drill holes and mount screws would just have shattered it. So I mounted it to a wooden board with duct tape-). On one edge of the board I mounted a wooden guide. 1/2" high by 1/4" wide. More then big enough for the dark. At the time I only had 8" wide rolls of paper so I mounted the same sort of guide 8" across from the first guide. With the lights on I'll mount some sort of guide for length. All I do is clamp a third board at the right distance.

    At the other end I made something similar to the things that hold butcher paper. Think a square U. At the tops I used a forstner bit to cut an open O. The paper rolls fits nicely onto an old broom handle. The whole combination is simple to put together in the dark. Big broom handle. Big holes for mounting it. I've found that what works with the lights on didn't work for me with the lights off. The second guide for example was added because I couldn't get straight cuts with the lights off. Seems with the lights on I would adjust the paper without even knowing it. So I've made the setup almost impossible to screw up.

    I need to make a new one for 10" wide paper.

    If the roll film can be mounted onto some thing round [dowel etc] then I think my setup would work okay for film.

  2. #12
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,073
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    146
    Emile, I've dreamed of a 9.5X23" custom but dream is as far as I ever expext it to get.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Middletown ct.
    Posts
    93
    Jim, that would be a hell of a camera!

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by jimgalli
    There's a seller on Ebay called mrfoto1 that sells it. Yes, you can cut 7X17 from the 9 1/2" wide rolls but you'd need a larger cutter than what I described. I plan on doing this and 8X20 as well but I'll have to get a cutter with a 24" cut area.
    Does he sell color film? We (S&S) are currently making some custom 9.5X20" holders for a customer and I was toying with the idea of making a few extra for myself for color work via an adaptor back with the Canham 12X20. If anyone else is interested let me know as soon as possible and we might be able to include you on the production run.

    Sandy King

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Middletown ct.
    Posts
    93
    Hi Sandy,
    He is getting his aerial color film from Kodak but for some strange reason it is cheaper in the orient than direct from the source here in the US. It aint cheap.
    Also...that is a great idea for the 9.5x20 back for a 12x20. I might be interested in some of those holders.
    Best,
    Emile

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    60
    Hi all!

    Does anyone have experience with the Kodak XX aerial film?

    Also, I thought these films (aerial) have a different sensitivity to red light. How does this affect using them?

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    378
    I don't know about the color sensitivities of color aerial film, but I do know that black and white (and probably color as well) aerial film have exposure indices which correspond to high density negatives. Therefore, for pictorial use, a modification of these indices is in order. I believe you actually rate the film at a higher EI than is used in the air. I have been fascinated by the prospects of using aerial film, especially the 70mm modified for use in 35mm or 70mm still equipment, but being short of the necessary funds, I haven't been able to partake in such an endeavour. However, if someone gets around to cutting the stuff down to size, I'd love to buy some of the stuff to see what it's like. The aerial panatomic-x in particular sounds like fun. I've heard that it is very similar to the old still panatomic-x (was it asa 50?) if rated at the same speed as the still film.

    Regards.
    ~Karl Borowski

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    France
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    63
    I bought a roll of PlusX aerial for my 7x17" (about 80 sheets, low price), cut by the seller : not really a bad film in normal conditions, but a lot of diffusion in backlit shots. There's a big difference for example when photographing foliages with the sun behind them in comparison with a classical film like my current HP5.

    In this size, this very thin film is more difficult to handle in trays than another one.

    Unless I couldn't find more other films, I wouldn't buy PlusX aerial film more.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin