Observing Transit of Venus
By chance, I'll be in Florida on Tuesday when Venus is scheduled to transit in front of the sun. It should be visible from about 6pm onwards.
I thought that a 4x5 view camera might make a good viewer. I've experimented with a pinhole mounted on a lensboard and can make fairly poor images of lightbulb filaments on the ground glass. I'd rather use a lens, but worry about how safe it is. I presume the dangers are targeting a bright light into my eye, overheating the ground glass or damaging the lens. That said, I have taken plenty of pictures with the sun in shot them and not had any problems.
Unlike an eclipse, a transit will not appreciably reduce the amount of light coming from the sun. Venus will be a very small dot crossing the upper right quadrant of the sun, so you will need a long focal length and expose as though you were photographing the Sun. The eclipse will still be in progress as the Sun sets from Florida, so if possible you will want as low a western horizon as possible. You should have an hour and a half to two hours (depending on your western horizon) or so from the beginning of the eclipse at 6:04 EDT until the sun sets, so there's plenty of time for multiple setups, exposures, etc. -- no need to hurry with this one!
As always, do not look at the sun without adequate eye protection! Use a #14 welder's glass, a purpose-made solar shield or solar glasses, etc. Exposed film and neutral density filters do not block enough solar radiation to protect your eyes -- don't use them! Do not look through a lens at the sun, even for a moment: eye damage will result instantaneously. Do not look at the sun's image on your ground glass with a loupe or magnifier -- you will damage your eye!
Be safe and good luck!
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming– “Wow! What a Ride!”
— Hunter S. Thompson
If you intend to use a lens or pinhole to form an image of the sun remember that the diameter of the sun image is the focal length/focal distance in millimetres divided by 100.
To get a 50mm diameter sun disk you need a 5000mm lens! In practice using a telescope in eyepiece projection mode is the way to go. That's what I'll be doing. And I won't be letting any direct rays from the sun or it's image get into my eyes.
Photography, the word itself, invented and defined by its author Sir John.F.W.Herschel, 14 March 1839 at the Royal Society, Somerset House, London. Quote "...Photography or the application of the Chemical rays of light to the purpose of pictorial representation,..". unquote.
The first problem is getting clear skies!! All this rain coming down from Queensland — not funny!
I think there will be a huge number of people with ruined cameras just going out and poking their camera up at the sun. Excellent way to fry lenses, mirrors and shutters...
.::Gary Rowan Higgins
One beautiful image is worth
a thousand hours of therapy.
"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government
to save the environment."
Do you have an infrared filter?
When the solar eclipse happened a couple Sunday's ago, the weather was such that I thought I wouldn't see it at all so I didn't set up the telescope. I scrambled when it finally cleared to get something and I grabbed my infrared filter. I put that on my d****l and took a few quick shots to see what would happen and got awesome results. Unfortunately, when I switched it back to my K1000, it was loaded with infrared film which was a huge mistake. If I would have had 25 ISO something in there other than infrared the shots probably would have been great.
Note that what I just described is safe for the camera, but not you. The infrared is really bad for your eyes too and you really shouldn't look through the viewfinder. I pretty much just glanced in there to make sure I was on target.
For the transit, I'm actually aligning the telescope tonight and rubber strapping some sheets to it (I have a solar filter).
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
Dang it all. I actually drove past the telescope factory Saturday and didn't pick up a solar filter while I was in the neighborhood. What was I thinking?
Originally Posted by docchilie
Hey guys; I'm kind of excited myself about getting a picture that won't be possible for another century.
My longest lens is a 180mm/315mm S&K Symmar convertible. It should be clear skies here in Kansas this evening, and there's a lake nearby that will provide an excellent horizon.
I need to look at all my Wratten filters, but I'm thinking I can just stack 2 opposing color separation filters and give it hell at f/45 and 1/200th, with TXP320 @ 200.
Disc of the sun is EV33.6 (from my Venus thread), i.e. 19 stops more than Sunny-16; you can maybe do your exposure calculations from that.
2 opposing filters will obviously give a fair amount of attenuation but not (I think) predictably. Most of them don't cut UV very well, and with a direct image of the sun I suspect that UV light is going to have a big impact on your exposure once you've cut out a lot of visible light.
I have a supply of theatrical neutral density gel in my studio flash kit.
With a pack and head rig in some situations you can't always just dial back one head, and you don't always want to pull back with certain light modifiers, so a bit of ND across part or all of the tube output is the cats meow for that situation.
I folded a couple of thicknesses of ND9, ie a three stop neutral density a few times back onto itself until the digithing I was using to meter on the fly started to show a reasonable exposure solution.
I know multiple acetate filters are not the prefered optical solution, but the results from the digi via the occular of one side of a pair of binoculars yielded a pretty good image. I have yet to process the film I shot.
my real name, imagine that.
I used a pair of free solar glasses the kids got at the Adler Planetarium yesterday. Made a filter out of one of the lenses, an index card, and duct tape. LOL.
You can see the non-film shot here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/2295319...in/photostream
I also used Ektar with a Pentax 6x7 & 300MM. We shall have to wait for that.