Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 63,995   Posts: 1,345,504   Online: 896
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ogden, Utah USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    559
    the depth of field calculator on my combat speed graphic with a 127mm optar (ektar) uses a 1/300th of an inch circle of confusion assumption. With that it says, for example, that you are in focus from 21feet 6 inches feet to 29feet 7inches when the lens is set at f 4.5. It doesn't say how large a print that assumes, however, but I would guess an 8 by 10 inch. The larger the print, the less depth of field is safe to assume, as others have said.

    I'm something of a pragmatist about these things -- or maybe subjectivist is a better word. Play around until you find a method that gives you nice images and don't worry about the technical aspects of things.

  2. #12
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ignacio, CO, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,172
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    18
    The problem I see with the fixed number model examples above, 1/300 or 1/1000, is that only the lens and film are considered.

    Its a guess, but I think a reasonable one, that those numbers were generated based on "normal" print size, viewing distance, and expectations.
    Mark Barendt, Ignacio, CO

    "The mind that opens to a new idea never returns to its original size." Albert Einstein

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:


 
                          

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin