Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,986   Posts: 1,523,987   Online: 809
      
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,510
    In marketing it's a standing joke that anything can be proven with a Powerpoint graph. In politics anything can be proven by a poll. And in equipment forums, anything can be proven with some web search. The whole idea is
    to be so nonspecific with your parameters that everything is plastic, and can be moulded any way one wishes.
    And over and over again in questions just like the one at hand, "sharpness" can mean any number of things. A good sample of an ancient 90 Angulon can be deadly sharp in the middle but pretty mushy near the margins if
    movements are involved. Referring to an Apo Sironar S is meaningless in this conversation because it wouldn't
    even cover 4x5 if it was made in a 90. Same concept per Nikon: the 4.5 has a larger image circle than the f/8, which might or might not determine which is sharper for a given application. In architectural work it might make a big difference. All kinds of variables here. And nobody has even brought up analogous lenses adjacent to 90,
    like the 80 or 110 Super-Symmar with an aspheric elements. It's not like working with a traditional 35mm lens
    where you just point it a certain direction. View camera lenses have different performance standards with various kinds of swings, tilts, rise, etc, plus the regular f-stop related issues. Determining what is appropriate for your personal application is often best learned from people using such lenses in analogous applications, not by
    crunching relatively meaningless numbers like the pixel-counters are addicted to.

  2. #32
    Andre Noble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Beverly Hills, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    220
    I did not know that the image circle of the Nikon 90mm 4.5 was larger than that of the 90mm f8.(?) According to the Nikon Large Format Lens brochure before me, the image circle for the Nikon 90 SW f8 and the f4.5 are the same.
    Andre Noble, Beverly Hills California http://andrenoble.com/

  3. #33

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,329
    Andre, I have no dog in this fight. And I don't have any LF Nikkors in shutter, let alone either of the 90s you're wrangling about, so I can't ask the lens(es) myself. But I do have the catalog, and I think you've misread it.

    Nikkor-SW 90mm f/4.5S Nikkor-SW 90mm f/8S

    Covering power f/4.5) 80░ (f/8) 80░
    Covering power (f/16) 105░ (f/22) 105░

    Image circle (f/4.5) °154mm (f/8) °154mm
    Image circle (f/16) °235mm (f/22) °235mm

    The f/4.5er has the same image circle at f/16 as the f/8er has at f/22. Question of the day, does the f/4.5er gain image circle if stopped down below f/16?

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,510
    Obviously.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin