Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,886   Posts: 1,520,664   Online: 1134
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Alamo City, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    890

    10" Commercial Ektar Lens In Copal Shutter?

    I know it can be custom done but I'll never understand why one would choose the Copal seven blade aperture over the nice round Ilex. At any rate, I just bought a 10" Commercial Ektar mounted in a Copal #3-S shutter. The front cell uses an adapter but the rear cell screws straight in. Out of curiosity I tried to move the cells to an Ilex #4 but they don't fit.

    This is a 1961 model Ektar lens. There are no custom markings on the shutter body, cells or the adapter.

    QUESTION #!: Did E.K. ever factory-mount their Commercial Ektar lenses in Copal shutters?

    QUESTION #2: If they didn't is there any way to determine who did the work?

    I'm trying to determine whether or not I should keep it. It arrived with far more cosmetic damage than was indicated in the auction. It's functionally sound though.... unless there's an issue with cell mismatch or misalignment.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,990
    Quote Originally Posted by Old-N-Feeble View Post
    ... I'll never understand why one would choose the Copal seven blade aperture over the nice round Ilex ...
    I'll never understand that either. The Ilex is a swell shutter.

    Re Q#1: I'm no expert in that area but I don't think so.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,990
    Oh... one thing I do remember hearing is that the Eastman Kodak Ilex were different from the "regular" Ilex. That could be why it didn't fit.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Alamo City, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    890
    I've been pondering the idea of having the Ektar cells re-fitted to a #4 Ilex and using the Copal 3-S for a 305mm Computar because it's a direct fit. But... I really want the Computar more and having one fit into an Ilex #5 with a nice round aperture shouldn't cost any more than having the Ektar re-fitted.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Alamo City, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    890
    These pics might help clear things up a bit...

    Front View...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6940.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	70.9 KB 
ID:	59356

    All Apart (front adapter to the upper-right)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6941.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	52.7 KB 
ID:	59357

    Front Cell Screwed Into Front Adapter
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6943.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	50.5 KB 
ID:	59358

    Rear Cell Is Direct Fit Into the Copal 3-S
    (is not screwed all the way in)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6942.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	63.0 KB 
ID:	59359
    Last edited by Old-N-Feeble; 11-04-2012 at 05:35 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    570
    I looks like the rear cell does have an adapter to reduce the diameter, but maybe the pictures are deceiving.

    As mentioned above. Illex shutters made for Kodak lenses have different threads than the standard ones. You would need an Illex originally made for the lens. That's going to be tough to find unless you stumble onto a really trashed Ektar in shutter.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Alamo City, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    890
    Maybe these will help...

    Closer Pics of the Rear Cell Group
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6944.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	63.7 KB 
ID:	59369

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6945.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	55.4 KB 
ID:	59370

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6946.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	27.6 KB 
ID:	59371

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6947.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	52.4 KB 
ID:	59372

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCN6949.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	38.6 KB 
ID:	59373

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,318
    For standard (not Kodak) Ilex dimensions go here: http://www.skgrimes.com/library/used...-shutters/ilex

    For Copal dimensions go here: http://www.skgrimes.com/products/new...standardcopals

    Measure your cells. The rear appears to be in an adapter.

    Bookmark these links and don't forget them.

  9. #9
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,401
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    155
    Your shutter is 1985 - ish. 2nd gen Copal 3 with chrome selector ring. In fact I never saw them call it a 3S until about that time frame. So someone has done a fine job of retro-fitting. 305 Computar f9 in that shutter trumps the he!! out of the ubiquitous Kodak.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin