Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,276   Posts: 1,534,787   Online: 830
      
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 61
  1. #51

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    11

    sheet developing

    Thank you Roger and Rawhead,

    Thanks for all help and advice. To update; I recently went to my photo finisher around the corner from me and was told they will no longer handle my 3 1/4" x 4 1/4" negs anymore....so, I went to my other option on the other end of town and dropped off my 12 sheets to them from my magbag. Their fee is 4.50 per sheet. They are a great shop that is keeping film alive, but I realized I definitely do not want to be spending that amount for every sheet. The counter person understood my dilemma and as many people have advised, he showed me a Patterson tank with an adjustable frame that I can load my sheets into for developing. For $40 it seems like the obvious way to go. Before I purchase it, I just wanted to see if that is a good standard tank that most people use or should I be considering another brand? Also, I am following Rawhead's advice and looking out for an old beater RB that I can scavenge the 4 x 5 rotating back off of to install on the smaller Graflex, but for now, I want to give developing it myself a try. Here is the last photo I took with the RB series B 4 x 5; these cameras are really a hoot!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails gg:g.reflex.jpg  

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,537
    Images
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by pablogustav View Post
    Thank you Roger and Rawhead,

    Thanks for all help and advice. To update; I recently went to my photo finisher around the corner from me and was told they will no longer handle my 3 1/4" x 4 1/4" negs anymore....so, I went to my other option on the other end of town and dropped off my 12 sheets to them from my magbag. Their fee is 4.50 per sheet. They are a great shop that is keeping film alive, but I realized I definitely do not want to be spending that amount for every sheet. The counter person understood my dilemma and as many people have advised, he showed me a Patterson tank with an adjustable frame that I can load my sheets into for developing. For $40 it seems like the obvious way to go. Before I purchase it, I just wanted to see if that is a good standard tank that most people use or should I be considering another brand? Also, I am following Rawhead's advice and looking out for an old beater RB that I can scavenge the 4 x 5 rotating back off of to install on the smaller Graflex, but for now, I want to give developing it myself a try. Here is the last photo I took with the RB series B 4 x 5; these cameras are really a hoot!
    A Patterson tank with an adjustable frame for 3.25x4.25??
    News to me.

    I use the Patterson System 4 tank with handmade nylon screen tubes that you fit the film in (Emulsion to the inside). You get 4 or 5 tubes per load. Develop just like 135 film. The other solution is with fluorescent tube protectors cut to length, but then you have an additional step of washing the anti-halation film off the back when you are finished processing.

    Good luck. You will find processing your own give infinitely more control over your whole process.

    tim in san jose
    Where ever you are, there you be.

  3. #53

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    548
    Here you go; got the conversion plate from Bert a couple days ago, finally found the time to do the conversion. Took all of 35 minutes. 100% reversible.

    Only issue at the moment is that there's a focus calibration issue, and I may have to adjust the top ground glass to coincide with the rear focal plane.

    It covers a pretty big chunk of a 4x5 Fuji Instant film. Need to check with 3x4 Instant as well as 4x5 film, coming soon

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0806.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	475.4 KB 
ID:	64992

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0808.JPG 
Views:	24 
Size:	210.8 KB 
ID:	64993

  4. #54
    shutterfinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Mid Peninsula, Ca.
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    431
    1. Bert's got 20 years on me.
    2. A standard film holder backing plate is .197 ± .007 from the film holder edge for formats 2x3 through 4x5.
    http://home.earthlink.net/~eahoo/page8/filmhold.html
    3. A Graflex film holder backing plate is .224 from the film holder edge in 4x5, tolerance unknown.
    4. The view hood ground glass can be shimmed up to 1/8 inch (.125) higher without causing problems, lowering more than .010 inch may require milling the mount opening down.
    5. TriX TXP sheet film is .007 inch thick.

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,537
    Images
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by shutterfinger View Post
    1. Bert's got 20 years on me.
    2. A standard film holder backing plate is .197 ± .007 from the film holder edge for formats 2x3 through 4x5.
    http://home.earthlink.net/~eahoo/page8/filmhold.html
    3. A Graflex film holder backing plate is .224 from the film holder edge in 4x5, tolerance unknown.
    4. The view hood ground glass can be shimmed up to 1/8 inch (.125) higher without causing problems, lowering more than .010 inch may require milling the mount opening down.
    5. TriX TXP sheet film is .007 inch thick.
    What is the delta difference between the base of the Gralex mount and the Graflok mount to the same point within the camera body? The math states you have 0.015 to 0.150 to play with, yes?

    tim in san jose
    Where ever you are, there you be.

  6. #56
    shutterfinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Mid Peninsula, Ca.
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    431
    The standard film holder places the film closer to the lens making the image out of focus when used on a camera whose ground glass is set for the Graflex film plane. This is the reason the Graflex SLR view hood ground glass has to be repositioned when converting the camera from using Graflex film holders to using standard film holders even if the back is replaced and mounted in the same position as the original.

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,537
    Images
    77
    So you are saying the old back plate and the new back plate are the same thickness?
    Where ever you are, there you be.

  8. #58
    shutterfinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Mid Peninsula, Ca.
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    431
    I've only done 2 mods, converted a 1910 RB Auto to use standard film holders then switched it back when I sold it; Made an adapter for a 3x4 RB Auto to hold a Graphic roll film holder. In both cases the original back frame was used.
    Last edited by shutterfinger; 03-05-2013 at 02:28 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  9. #59
    mhcfires's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    El Cajon, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    550
    I have two 6x9 roll film holders for my 3x4 Model D SLR. If push comes to shove on sheet film, I can always shoot 120. I have plenty of green sensitive x-ray film, I'm going to try cutting it and loading into a bag-mag. Converting it looks to be too much of a PITA.

    m
    Michael Cienfuegos


    If you don't want to stand behind our troops, please feel free to stand in front of them.

  10. #60

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    548
    Don't quite understand why you think it's a PITA, when it's been noted several times in this thread, and confirmed by me, that the conversion takes less than 30 minutes, and is 100% reversible.

    Now, cutting down *any* sized film down to 3x4 for each and very frame in a darkroom, or even under safe-lights... now THAT is a PITA But I guess to each his own. I'll enjoy shooting stock 4x5 sheet film and 4x5 as well as 3x4 Fuji/Polaroid instant film on my converted R.B.

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin