Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,978   Posts: 1,523,689   Online: 1127
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    93
    It was my first time to see such a modular lens...
    The inner lenses are mounted in threaded lens holders. All of the lens groups seem to have matching threads, even the back lens, so I could rebuild the lens like this:
    () )( )( S ()
    or this
    () S () )( )(
    or this
    () S )( )( ()
    etc...

    I think the seller was genuine, maybe made a mistake while cleaning.
    For me here in Australia, cost of shipping makes returning a very expensive option, so I'll be keeping the lens.
    If I was in the USA I probably would not.
    It seems to cover 8x10 - I'll post a sample this weekend for anyone interested.
    Thanks for your comments everyone.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    93
    Here's a quick paper neg I just took with the 14" apo artar...- the lens seems sharp and clear:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/9314116...n/photostream/

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,326
    On my screen it looks very soft. Could be the scan, could be my screen.

    And there's no detail discernable in the corners so assessing coverage is impossible.

    And it is a closeup shot so even if there were detail in the corners assessing coverage at infinity is impossible.

  4. #14
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,039
    Images
    38
    The Goerz 14" Apo Artar must be very different from the lens I have which is a Goerz 14" Apochromatic Red Dot Artar. I use mine more than any other on my 8x10 and it has lots of coverage and is very sharp. I do mostly still life but I have taken it out and used it at infinite a few times.
    Dennis

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    93
    Hi dpurdy,
    I'm interested to hear your comments... I haven't used the lens much -the picture above is the first time I really used it, so I don't want to draw conclusions about image quality yet.
    I thought the red dot variations were coated, non red dot are non coated.
    The lily picture is shot as a paper negative... Does it seem soft compared to your expectations?
    Thanks,
    Mark

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    93
    8x10 coverage Test @f/32
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/9314116@N06/9475125525/
    Seems good, haven't tried movements yet.
    Next I will try f/9.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,060
    seems soft.

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,326
    Quote Originally Posted by mkillmer View Post
    8x10 coverage Test @f/32
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/9314116@N06/9475125525/
    Seems good, haven't tried movements yet.
    Next I will try f/9.
    Another non-test.

    Shoot a brick wall, and make sure that the film plane is parallel to the wall. That way you'll have detail in the corners. No detail in the corners, no information about coverage.

    And to my eyes y'r non-test is soft all over. The lower right corner is especially soft. How's your eyesight?

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    93
    A brick wall is a good suggestion, Dan.
    Unfortunately the shutter on the goerz is not 100%.. No B or T mode. I'll have to work out a good way to find a wall the shoot it. Since I'm shooting paper at iso3, long exposures are difficult until I get the shutter fixed.

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,325
    According to Goerz' specifications, the shortest Artar which covers 8x10 sharply at infinity is the 16 1/2".

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin