Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,551   Posts: 1,544,898   Online: 928
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,278
    Images
    21
    There are a lot of options out there in the 210 mm range. For a long time I was using a 210/4.5 Tessar type made by Fuji; it's a perfectly good lens but bulky, and it's sort of been displaced as my "normal normal" by a 215/4.8 Ilex convertible that covers 8x10. (Come to think of it, drop me a PM if you want to try to work out a deal for that Fuji lens.) KEH is always overflowing with 210/5.6 plasmats, which for some reason they advertise as covering 4x5.

    I actually end up shooting almost as much with a 270mm G-Claron. It's a long-normal on 5x7 and a wide-normal on 8x10, it's little, and it's ridiculously sharp. I assume the other focal lengths are the same, but someone with actual experience of them may have more nuanced information.

    It's probably worth sticking with one or two lenses for a while, but to me anyway, much of the fun of LF is in the smorgasbord of interesting lenses. Brass convertibles with confusing names and funny aperture scales, process lenses abused for pictorial purposes, junk-box rescues---it's just plain *fun*. But I'm an engineer and my sense of "fun" doesn't always translate to other people's worlds. :-)

    -NT
    Nathan Tenny
    San Diego, CA, USA

    The lady of the house has to be a pretty swell sort of person to put up with the annoyance of a photographer.
    -The Little Technical Library, _Developing, Printing, And Enlarging_

  2. #12
    ROL
    ROL is offline
    ROL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    794
    Quote Originally Posted by j-dogg View Post
    The best 3-lens combo for LF?
    There is no best set of focal lengths (or maybe even manufacturer) for any format. Your unique "seeing" will, or should, be different as you move among them. A "normal" 35 image should not be aesthetically the same as a "normal" 120, a "normal" 4x5, a "normal" 5x7, and so on, even though you can certainly find technical equivalence between lenses in published comparative focal length tables – and this is not solely because of differing aspect ratios.

    FWIW, and intended only anecdotally, my three lens 5x7 kit consists of 110mm, 180mm, and 300mm. These choices were made based mainly on bellows draw, weight considerations, and availability. The 110mm, however, was a specific, and at the time expensive, choice for a wide angle, a comparable focal length I used frequently in smaller formats to establish important near–far relationships. I rarely use it! I have found that my 5x7 tastes lean more heavily to the 180 and 300 ...and longer – having somewhat recently added a fourth, 450mm, to the quill. The 110 may in fact eventually be dropped from my carry in favor of the new longer three, when weight considerations are paramount.
    Last edited by ROL; 10-01-2013 at 12:55 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: missing comma

  3. #13
    eclarke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Berlin, Wi
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    1,951
    Images
    71
    geez, I have around 80 modern lenses and a slough of vintage lenses. I know them all and pick the best one for the scene.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Floor-it-duh
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,137
    Images
    104
    Meh, I dont mind paying for good glass if the price is right.

    The Trioplan appears to cover the full 5x7 with minimal vignette if any I've already played with it a little. I planned on probably keeping it anyway
    5x7 Eastman-Kodak kit / B&L 135mm Zeiss Tessar + Compur Deckel
    4x5 Graphic View, made in USA! New project
    RB67 Pro S /50 4.5 / 90 3.8 / 180 4.5 / WLF / prism finder / polaback
    Random 35mm stuff

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Adirondacks
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,443
    Quote Originally Posted by j-dogg View Post
    Meh, I dont mind paying for good glass if the price is right.

    The Trioplan appears to cover the full 5x7 with minimal vignette if any I've already played with it a little. I planned on probably keeping it anyway
    Here is lesson number one regarding large format lenses: Circle of illumination and circle of sharp coverage are two different items entirely.

  6. #16
    Whiteymorange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boston area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,288
    Images
    26
    I have an old New Yorker cartoon on my fridge that shows the Holy Trinity to be Butter, Sugar and Salt... Never really gotten past that, I'm afraid.

    As for lenses: Try whatever you've got, then try lenses people will lend you. Figure out what you like. find one and buy it. No magic involved, just personal tastes.

  7. #17
    Mustafa Umut Sarac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    İstanbul - Türkiye
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,840
    Images
    108
    Cooke XV and XVa , Ektar , Wollensak and Protar

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by eclarke View Post
    geez, I have around 80 modern lenses and a slough of vintage lenses. I know them all and pick the best one for the scene.
    If I had that many lenses to choose from I think my brain would explode.

    I checked out your photography and the 80+ lenses obviously work for you!

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,338
    Yep, the 120, 210, 300 combo will do it. 120 Super Angulon, 210 Symmar-S or equivalent from Nikon or Rodenstock, and a Schneider 305 G-Claron. (Saves a lot of weight over a 300 Symmar of equivalent. Less glass, smaller shutter, very sharp.)

    Spend any left-over money on film!

  10. #20
    Keith Pitman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Pine Junction, CO
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    179
    I carry a 165 Angulon, 240 GC, 300 Fuji, and 450 Fuji. I used to carry a 110 SS, but didn't use it often. I've tried a few other focal lengths, but keep coming back to the same four lenses.
    Keith Pitman
    Photographer
    www.keithpitman.com

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin