Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,494   Posts: 1,543,008   Online: 747
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,390
    Quote Originally Posted by David H. Bebbington
    I'm sure they're good, Dan, but their prices seem to be pitched at the professional motion picture market, whereas for example the Serrac repair and shutter overhaul I mentioned will cost around £150 - enough, but affordable!
    David, you're right, they're much pricier than the much-maligned (for price, not quality of work) SKGrimes. FWIW, SKG's price for a shutter overhaul is typically < $US 100 and they recently charged me not too much to dismantle a 38/4.5 Biogon and remove crud from the inside of the rear element. But AFAIK SKG doesn't repolish or coat ...

    On another topic, I've been wondering for a while why Serracs command such relatively old prices. Can you explain it? To me they seem like just garden variety f/4.5 tessar types.

    Cheers,

    Dan

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tijeras, NM
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,246
    Have at it

    http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=lens+repair+cla

    Quote Originally Posted by medform-norm
    Well, maybe it's time to compile a new list of addresses we can recommend on either side of the globe. Your contribution would be welcome.

    Tomorrow we're taking Zodelar to a repair guy in our neighbourhood. See what he says/does. I know him as the Dutch mr. Rollei, but I don't know how good he is on non-Rollei stuff. We'll see.

    I've found some reference about Dutch machinists and camera repair places, but have no first-hand experience. And I don't want to judge from what I read on the web about them. It seems we have just some smaller repair stations, ranging from pretty simplistic hobbiest doing a good job on 35mm to very hi-tech instrument making companies. But nothing with the dedication and specialization of the SKGrimes company. SKGrimes may be expensive, but if I really needed help for expensive lenses, I would trust them with it sooner than anyone else.

    BTW: the old 150mm G-Claron fits in the Synchro-Compur of our 105 Xenar, but we don't know if the distance is right. It seems to look good. Now we need another Synchro-Compur, as the Xenar is staying where it is.

  3. #23
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm
    On another topic, I've been wondering for a while why Serracs command such relatively old prices. Can you explain it? To me they seem like just garden variety f/4.5 tessar types.
    A Serrac IS a Tessar-type lens, of course. The reason I bought mine and am spending money on it is just because it is an f4.5, with which I hope to obtain interesting modeling and pronounced out-of-focus backgrounds at full aperture. I really have not seen too many f4.5s of this length in a shutter, there seem to be quite a lot of Russian 300 mm barrel lenses, of course f5.6 Symmars of various ages and plenty of process-type lenses of f9 to 11. Aside from anything else, an f4.5 does give a nice bright focusing image!

    Regards,

    David

  4. #24
    medform-norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    863
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by avandesande
    Hi A!

    never thought of going and looking there. Never spend time on the Google groups since IME they are less polite than here, even taken into account the smallish skirmishes we tend to have now and then.

    Will ook through this long list once there is time. But how does one go about it filtering out the non-European threads? That's a question I'll need to solve, since I sure ain't sending stuff to Virginia if I can help it.

  5. #25
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    What's a "relatively old price"? Is that something like the Lancaster Patent Rectigraphic 12x10" which cost me the princely sum of £24 - the same as it cost new in 1904?

    I had a Xenar 300/f:4.5 in Compound #5 shutter, which was the biggest of the compounds. As you say nice and bright, and with that DOF there is no doubt at all about whether it's in focus or not...
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,390
    Quote Originally Posted by Ole
    What's a "relatively old price"? Is that something like the Lancaster Patent Rectigraphic 12x10" which cost me the princely sum of £24 - the same as it cost new in 1904?

    I had a Xenar 300/f:4.5 in Compound #5 shutter, which was the biggest of the compounds. As you say nice and bright, and with that DOF there is no doubt at all about whether it's in focus or not...
    Stupid typo, Ole. Had low in mind, my fingers wanted old. I seem to be losing control of myself. Arrrgh!

    Thinking of silly old lenses, last week I received a 4.75"/7.7 Aldis Uno. I have no idea when it was made, and the Vade Mecum was little help in putting a date on it. Not earlier than 1902. Tiny lens. Seems to cover 2x3, put what seems like a nice image on the ground glass wide open, not hard to focus. Am waiting for that roll of EPP to come back from the lab. Tried a pair of B&L f/6.3 Tessar IIbs on that roll too, one from 1914 or so, the other from the '20s. Got some serious macro shots too, our prickly pear is blooming.

  7. #27
    medform-norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    863
    Images
    1

    Zodelar performance

    The overexposed neg of the cleaned Zodelar were salvageable enough to get a good impression of it's performance - yippie! It's a real nice lens. Would you say this image is taken with a 80 yo lens?

    BTW what you see is part of a post-war modernist church(window) from the resurrection church in Arnhem. Looking through the lens, the funny mosaic window suddenly revealed its figurative side. Never noticed that before, always thought it was some meaningless abstracty mosaic type decoration. See what a good lens can do.
    Regards, Norm

    PS Forgot to mention: there was another shot taken at f45 which we liked better, but the neg was too bad to get any decent results
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails zodellar250_4,5_f16.jpg  

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin