Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,558   Posts: 1,545,232   Online: 899
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31

    "Numbered" lenses

    Once upon a time - about a century ago in Europe - it was common to mark lenses not with focal length, but a number. One of my lenses is an Emil Busch Weitwinkel-Aplanat No.3 f:14; another an O. Simon Anastigmat No.4 f:7.2.

    Others have focal lengths, but I haven't yet seen any with both markings.

    A No.0 would have been made for the smallest plate format, about 6.5x9cm. The No.1 is 9x12cm, or 4x5" if made in an "inch" country. No.2 covers 5x7" or 13x18cm, those are close enough to be considered the same. But from there on it breaks down: I know that the Busch illuminates the full 8x10", but not whether it's made for that, 18x24cm or some intermediate plate size. And then there are the larger plate sizes... The German sizes were 18x24, 24x30, 30x40, 40x50. Same sizes as enlarging paper is still sold in, but noone really knows why

    I'm bidding on a No. 6 Aplanat, hoping that it covers 30x40cm. If not, it will be a nice portrait lens for 8x10"!

    Anyone?
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,576
    Images
    27
    Hey Ole, you may have given me some information on the lens that came on the 8x10 Korona I just won. No marking on the lens (nice brass, covered with what looks like a black varnish or something) except the front and read elements of each set are marked with roman numerial III and then followed by a 4 or 5. Mounted the 5 last night and it was really nice coverage...full rise and fall, with the Korona..the lens are mounted in a Wollensak shutter marked Regino I think (it's at home and I'm not).

    Now I have something else to go on...if I find anything, will let you know.
    Mike C

    Rambles

  3. #3
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    I saw your question about that lens - and I'm stumped. At least temporarily.

    In a bit more than a week I'll be at home, and in a slightly better position to see if I can find any lens maker who marketer a "Serie III" - except Goerz (it's the Dagor) which I already know about. Is there any hint? Number of reflections? I guess it might be a Wollensak lens in Regno shutter - I have one of those, too (a "Rapid Convertible").
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  4. #4
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,402
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    155
    Goerz Doppel Anastigmat were listed this way. A no. 1 being a 6 inch #1a 6 1/2" #2-7" #3-8 1/4" #4-9 1/2" #5-10 3/4" #6-12" I'm going from memory here so may not be exact. But then there's a #2 Vitax Wollensak which I figured would be small but it's a huge 13" portrait lens. While a No. 8 VIIa Protar is a 7" lens. You would need a #30 Protar for the 12X16. Nothing holds up very well. Too bad really. My 14" Heliar is a #6 and a huge Voigtlander Euryscop RR Portrait is a #6. That kind of holds up to the different #6's being meant for a 10X8 plate.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  5. #5
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    The nice little Busch lens illuminates 8x10", the Simon Anastigmat covers 18x24cm with plenty of room for movements...

    The "portrait" lenses were intended for plate diagonals smaller than the focal length - a 13" portrait lens seems great for 5x7" assuming a 40° sharp coverage.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,407
    Quote Originally Posted by Ole
    I saw your question about that lens - and I'm stumped. At least temporarily.

    In a bit more than a week I'll be at home, and in a slightly better position to see if I can find any lens maker who marketer a "Serie III" - except Goerz (it's the Dagor) which I already know about. Is there any hint? Number of reflections? I guess it might be a Wollensak lens in Regno shutter - I have one of those, too (a "Rapid Convertible").
    Ole, if you don't have a copy of the Vade Mecum, you really should buy one. It will lead you farther astray, and it will boggle your mind with incomprehensible names for lenses. All those series! TTH, for one, made a Ser. III.

    Good luck, have fun

  7. #7
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm
    Ole, if you don't have a copy of the Vade Mecum, you really should buy one. It will lead you farther astray, and it will boggle your mind with incomprehensible names for lenses. All those series! TTH, for one, made a Ser. III...
    I have it. And the 1910 photography book by Herr Schmidt (can't remember the title at the moment - has lists, remarks and prices for the most common lenses in Germany at that time - , Beck's "Photographic Lenses", and a few more. But I have brought none of them with me to work in the North Sea.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin