Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,564   Posts: 1,573,432   Online: 919
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Dryden, Ontario
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    24

    The Future of Photography (as photographers saw it in 1944)

    I came across a link to this interesting article, published in 1944:

    The Future of Photography

    There are some very interesting and portentous predictions. I had to chuckle when I read "the day of the 11x14, 8x10, and even the 5x7 negative is about over" - that was written 60 years ago!

    Enjoy.

  2. #2
    MikeS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Newport, TN USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    220
    Images
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Dyck
    I came across a link to this interesting article, published in 1944:

    The Future of Photography

    There are some very interesting and portentous predictions. I had to chuckle when I read "the day of the 11x14, 8x10, and even the 5x7 negative is about over" - that was written 60 years ago!

    Enjoy.
    And it's absolutely correct! You can't take a quote out of context (well, you CAN, but it would be wrong). The words directly preceding that statement make it absolutely correct

    "Except for special purposes, the day of the 11x14, 8x10, and even the 5x7 negative is about over."

    LF photography IS a special purpose. You don't see families on vacation lugging around an 8x10 Kodak 2D with them! (Yes, I know, some of US might do that, but that's not what I mean!)

    -Mike

  3. #3
    bjorke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    SF & Surrounding Planet
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,032
    Images
    20
    That is a great link, but more IMO for the Abbot, Strand and Maholy-Nagy quotes. The rest is just technical marketing.

    "What Would Zeus Do?"
    KBPhotoRantPhotoPermitAPUG flickr Robot

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,530
    That was a great link! Do you think if they had had the internet they would have had pissing contests about LF vs 35 mm?

  5. #5
    esanford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Hertford North Carolina
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    637
    Images
    16
    Thanks for posting... a very interesting article...
    Often wrong, but never in doubt!

  6. #6
    TerryThomasAtlanta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    23

    no mention of computers or TV

    Even though both television and computers existed by 1944 no one put them together with photography. And who could blame them as both took up huge resources and energy.

    Interesting that Elliott described the Polaroid camera's workings when he said he would like to see a camera that dry developed it's own film. (Does Mr. Land owe him a check?) Guess having to worry about film processing on the front lines made him think that through.

    Also, they all expected the American Industry to produce top-notch cameras and lenses. Bet they were surprised what happened in the 20 years after 1944.

    How smart are we now? Anyone care to predict what photography will be like 60-odd years from now?



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin