Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,943   Posts: 1,557,659   Online: 1196
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Amund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Oslo,Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    902
    Images
    68
    I`m very pleased with my Shen-Hao, nice finish, everything`s nice and well-buildt, captive knobs ect... IMO, from what I`ve read, Shen-Hao has increased their quality over the last years.

  2. #12
    Dave Parker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,049
    Quote Originally Posted by jolimon
    I have a close friend who bought the sh@#-how and was totally disappointed by the poor fit and finish. Hard to slide in a film holder; flimsy;other problems......fortunately got it from jim at midwest and was able to switch for tachihara. much better camera for the dollar. can get graflock back for tachi from badger I believe as the nagaoka is same ? as tachi and they list one at $195 I think. Tachi can handle 65mm so doesnt need bag bellows. I am surprised at so much applause for sh@#-how as I was not impressed either. would definitely get tachihara......hi from the canadian rockies, richard
    I am very surpised to hear this, I have looked at hundreds of Shen's and have made hundreds of screens for Shen's and never heard any bad comments about them, after all, they are a good quality camera for under $600.00, in this day and age of 3 and 4K cameras, I think the Shen is one of the best and most flexable cameras on the market.

    Dave

  3. #13
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,360
    Images
    20
    I'd take the Shen-Hao for the rear movements, optional bag bellows and hinged compendium shade. Teak is a little heavier, but is moisture resistant. Collectors pay a lot for classic "tropical" cameras that were often made of teak.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    Some body here had to return thier "Shen Hao" to Mpex. They then got one from Badger? Maybe they'll see this and we'll see if my memory is any good-)

  5. #15
    Mongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    960
    I've had my Shen-Hao for a couple of years (the HZX45-II) and it's performed very well. Compared to the Tachihara, it has a Graflok back, more movements, slightly longer bellows extension, interchangeable bellows, and weighs more. The Tachihara is lighter, has a spring back, and handles short lenses more easily with the standard bellows, but the bellows are fixed so you can't replace them. The Tachihara has all of the movements most people would need for landscape work, but for architectural work the Shen-Hao is likelier to be the better match.

    After two years of heavy use, my camera still looks and performs like new. The biggest gripe that I've had with the camera is that the knobs that control the rise/fall and lock on the front standard are small and not the easiest to work with (especially if you lock them down very tightly; a bad habit that I've not yet broken). I solved this by picking up a couple of model car tires at a hobby shop and stretching them over the knobs. A couple of dollars to fix the greatest shortcoming the camera had for me is reasonable, given the low price of the camera and the way it's held up.

    The Shen-Hao is heavier than the Tachihara; if this matters to you then you might want to find out if you can live with the spring back on the Tachihara. There are solutions made for spring backs for many of the things that a Graflok back is normally used for (for example, Calumet had a roll film holder that would slide under a spring back).

    There have been some reports of QC issues with the Shen-Hao camera on the web, but there are also plenty of people who are happy with the camera (myself included). I don't think that the QC process at Shen-Hao can come close to the work that's done at a company like Ebony (one of the reasons that the Shen-Hao can be sold for so much less), but I also believe that if all of the cameras coming out of Shen-Hao were dogs then the companies distributing them would have dropped them a long time ago. If you have concerns about the quality of a particular camera, try calling up Midwest Photo Exchange and/or Badger Graphic to see if they'd be willing to inspect a camera for you before they send it out. Since both of these companies are going to stand behind the product that they sell to you, I'd imagine they'd be willing to work with you before the sale in order to avoid any headaches later on. I have no experience actually doing this, but common sense tells me that these people want you to be happy so they don't have to spend a lot of time supporting you after the sale...they make their money selling, not problem solving.

    If you're buying new, buy from a reputable company (Midwest and Badger would be my two recommendations) and if you get a bad camera they'll help you out. If you're buying used, make sure you have some form of recourse if there's a problem. Between these two cameras, I made my decision based on the greater flexibility of the Shen-Hao. I didn't care about the additional weight. I bought my camera from Midwest, and have been happy with the purchase. Had there been a problem, I'm sure Jim at Midwest would have worked with me to solve the problem...he's got a good reputation among LF photographers.

    Good luck with your decision.
    Last edited by Mongo; 08-18-2005 at 12:04 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Film is cheap. Opportunities are priceless.

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    31
    I got my Shen-Hao from Badger about two weeks ago and I must say that I am very impressed by the build quality and the range of movements it offers. I went through the same decision process and ended up chosing the Shen over the Tachihara - main reason being the Graflok back on the Shen and the range of movements. Yes, the Shen is heavier than the tachihara, but in the big scheme it makes no difference to me. By the time I pack my lenses and all the other gear the 1.5 pounds or so more won't even matter. I also think that the Shen looks better than the Tachihara - I like the understated look of the black metal better than the brass look of the Tachi.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Israel
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    365
    Thanks guys.
    So far Shen-Hao seems to be best bet among affordable yet most capable folders.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin