Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,592   Posts: 1,546,029   Online: 985
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    248

    Pros/Cons Fuji 600tele vs 600c for 8x10?

    I have a tachihara 810 double extension (22" bellows) and am thinking of doing 1 of 2 things:

    1) By the Triple and a 600c and a 750
    2) keep the double and get the tele with other components

    Any deal-breaker pros/cons for either lens?

    Thanks

    bob

  2. #2
    Loose Gravel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    921
    Images
    14
    I don't have the any of this equipment exactly. I have the 450C which is light and small. I have the Nikkor 600/800T. It is big and heavy and really should be used with a support bracket that I made for my 57 Deardorff. Because tele is big and heavy, it doesn't get out much. I figure I can use the 450 and crop.
    Watch for Loose Gravel

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    40
    You have the familiar dilemma of lighter camera/heavy lenses versus heavier camera/lighter lenses that we all struggle with. Which way you go depends heavily on your particular usage patterns and priorities.

    The Fuji 600T (I presume this is the tele you are referring to?) has only a 260mm image circle, and will not cover 8x10. The Nikkor 600T and 800T would be your best telephoto option for your existing camera. The Fuji 600C is a bit sharper and more contrasty than the Nikkor 600T, although if you are contact printing this may not make much of a difference. If your goal is big enlargements, or your shoot color, then I would prefer the 600C. In either case, the camera should be stabilized with either a second tripod or a long-lens support arm, as camera stability is without question the biggest factor in getting good results with long 8x10 lenses. The 600T is easier to stabilize than the 600C, in that it requires 164mm less extension at infinity focus.

    Personally I tested the Nikkor 600/800/1200T and Fuji 600C, and preferred the Fuji because I shoot mostly color and appreciated the greater contrast and color saturation the Fuji gave me. More recently I replaced the 600C with an APO Tele Xenar 600/800 telephoto, a superb lens that gives me the best of both worlds (excellent color and contrast, reduced extension of the telephoto); but this lens is extremely expensive. My camera has over 900mm of extension so I was free to select lenses without regard to extension limitations.

  4. #4
    df cardwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,342
    Images
    8
    Hey Bobbie

    I think you want something that is exceeding the design of the camera.

    Compare the use of ( for example ) a Deardorff with a 600 Repro Claron ( C Fujinon, Apo Nikkor, Red Dot, etc ).

    Or, for even more solidity with long lenses, a C-1 Calumet.

    That's easy-peasy.

    .
    "One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid,
    and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"

    -Bertrand Russell

  5. #5
    Rob Skeoch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Burlington, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    984
    I haven't used the Fuji 600C but own the 300 and 450C lenses. I wouldn't take a chance on any other but would pick up the 600C myself.
    -Rob Skeoch
    BigCameraWorkshops.com

  6. #6
    rbarker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Rio Rancho, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,222
    Images
    2
    We don't have enough bellows for a 600mm lens of non-tele design, Bob. (I have the same camera.)
    [COLOR=SlateGray]"You can't depend on your eyes if your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain[/COLOR]

    Ralph Barker
    Rio Rancho, NM

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    248
    After further scouting, it seems most feel the tele ain't that hot and that a cropped 450c shot is as sharp as a full shot from the 600t. So, I guess it's gonna be a Tachihara Triple. Thanks for all the input.

    bob

  8. #8
    df cardwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,342
    Images
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by bobbysandstrom
    After further scouting, it seems most feel the tele ain't that hot and that a cropped 450c shot is as sharp as a full shot from the 600t. So, I guess it's gonna be a Tachihara Triple. Thanks for all the input.

    bob
    Small rate of return with the 600 tele over the 450 !

    AND it is an ABSOLUTE headache to do movements with a tele !

    d
    "One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid,
    and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"

    -Bertrand Russell

  9. #9
    naturephoto1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Breinigsville, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,819
    Images
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by df cardwell
    Small rate of return with the 600 tele over the 450 !

    AND it is an ABSOLUTE headache to do movements with a tele !

    d
    Yes and no on the headache for movements with a tele. I have the Nikon 500 T ED for my Linhof Technikardan 45S. Not too much problem using the tele for rise, fall, and shift. However, at least for landscape, I use rear tilts and swings largely due to the weight of the lens and the nodal point. You can check my website for a photo of Moonset, Hallett Peak

    http://www.nelridge.com/picturepages...allettpeak.htm

    The 50" copy is almost as sharp as the 24" copy. You just have to stand a few feet back. Photo was taken on the original Gitzo 1228 Mountaineer Carbon Fiber Tripod with Arca B1 Ball. Exposure time of 1/8 sec at F32. Everything is in sharp focus from the cones in the Pines from about 1/4 mile to the moon. Exposure time due to need for the depth of field and need to stop the moon moving through the field (any longer and the moon would have blurred) between gusts of wind.

    Rich
    Richard A. Nelridge
    http://www.nelridge.com

  10. #10
    jp80874's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bath, OH 44210 USA
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,436
    Images
    6
    I have the 600C with an old Phillips Advantage with 30" of bellows, and like it very much. I don't really use it a lot because with my choice of subjects I can usually simply move closer and use either my 450 Nikon M or the Standard 300 Schneider
    APO Symmar.

    I hate to be this vague but I would encourage you to do a Google search on the 600 telephoto. I remember reading several reviews that were not favorable on the quality compared to the 600C, but I cannot site URLs. sorry.

    John Powers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin