Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,864   Posts: 1,583,191   Online: 742
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    403

    Using a Century Studio Camera

    Ever since I first saw one I've had a desire to own one of these beasts. Up until last weekend it was just a nice fantasy as I'd never seen one for sale locally and the people on eBay seemed strangely reluctant to post one to Australia :-)

    Last weekend I went for a drive to pick up a 20" 5.6 aerial lense and popped in to an antiques centre on the way back. One of the dealers specialised in camera equipment and has two Centuries in stock and said he had sold three over the course of the last year. One was on a two post stand and the other on a three legged stand (i.e. a geared stand, not a folding tripod). Both came with big brass lenses and had reasonable price tags (by local standards).

    Now that this has become more than just a vague possibility, I was wondering whether they are in fact usable cameras. I'm most interested in portraits which is what I assume these were designed to do. Would I need a huge studio or can you get by with more modest camera to subject distances?

    I enjoy using old equipment but don't want to be a collector of static objects. Similarly, I could spend the same sort of money to get a modest modern(ish) 8x10 outfit but that doesn't interest me.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,065
    Images
    39
    I have one, but I forget exactly with one. A number 6, I think. It has the crank up and down stand. They are very usable cameras. The difficulty is with getting people to stay still and yet look natural. Not only is the depth of field a problem with the longer lenses needed, probably 420mm and up, but focusing takes awhile, and if the people move the composition and focus are gone. I like using F32 with my 600mm Fuji lens, and that means having a lot of light available.

  3. #3
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,422
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    156
    I use mine all the time. The piece I just posted about bokeh was done with it and many of the blogs with different old portrait lenses at my website have been done with that old camera. No one would call it pretty, but I love working with it. With the big lens aperture holder on the front and the packard inside I test and enjoy any number of weird old gigantic lenses.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 9a_2.jpg   9a_1.jpg  
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  4. #4
    JG Motamedi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    469
    I used one for a few years, eventually the bellows fell apart and I never replaced it. If you can live without front movements and portability they are great cameras. For portraiture they work just fine, since movements aren't an issue. As Jim points out, the best thing about them is the massive lensboard and very stable front (and rear) standard.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    403
    Thanks for the responses, it sounds like it might just be worth doing. Hmm, maybe it's time to see what equipment could be moved on to drum up some funds.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin