Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,274   Posts: 1,534,659   Online: 1106
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    423
    Images
    30

    Question for Lens Gurus and other insightful LF'ers

    I am always checking out barrel lens to see if they will fit a particular shutter. I just discovered that my Wollensak 9" (229mm) f5.6 raptar copy barrel lens are threaded such that they will fit a large alphax shutter I have which came with Wollensak 11 7/8" (302mm) f4.5 lens. The overall length of the 9" raptar copy lens in its barrel is 69.48mm and the overall length of these cells in the alphax shutter is 70.27mm. This appears to be a minimal difference (.79mm), but should the quality of the photographs from the cells in the barrel be equivalent to pics with these cells when using them in the more convenient alphax shutter? Now I realize this will best be checked on my V8 deardorff, but I want the local gurus to provide me with your techinal expertise and opinions. I thank you for your interest and comments.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,373
    Images
    88
    This is not something I've ever tried, but here's a source of info on S K Grimes' site, who also happens to be an APUG sponsor.
    http://www.skgrimes.com/lensmount/24art/index.htm

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    1,298
    I believe the one problem you need to work out is that your new lens is a 5.6 and the shutter is marked 4.5. Your aperture scale will be wrong, so you will want to work out the math or get SK grimes to put a new F/stop scale on it for you.

  4. #4
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,401
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    155
    I don't have a Knowledgeable answer for you but FWIW in the case of the Computar f9 copy lenses, when the factory put them in shutters for general photo use, they added a 1mm spacer at the rear cell so the shuttered version is 1mm futher apart in the spacing than the copy version in barrel. Maybe the 229 would react the same. All you can do is test.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  5. #5
    df cardwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,342
    Images
    8
    How will you be using this lens ? It doesn't have excess coverage at normal working distance: plasmats and dagors are extremely sensitive to spacing. But stopping well down, and not enlarging the negatives, might obscure any problems.

    But this is all pointless speculation: it is too complex to predict what might happen. You tell US if it works !

    d
    "One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid,
    and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"

    -Bertrand Russell

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,362
    Quote Originally Posted by jonw
    I am always checking out barrel lens to see if they will fit a particular shutter. I just discovered that my Wollensak 9" (229mm) f5.6 raptar copy barrel lens are threaded such that they will fit a large alphax shutter I have which came with Wollensak 11 7/8" (302mm) f4.5 lens. The overall length of the 9" raptar copy lens in its barrel is 69.48mm and the overall length of these cells in the alphax shutter is 70.27mm. This appears to be a minimal difference (.79mm), but should the quality of the photographs from the cells in the barrel be equivalent to pics with these cells when using them in the more convenient alphax shutter? Now I realize this will best be checked on my V8 deardorff, but I want the local gurus to provide me with your techinal expertise and opinions. I thank you for your interest and comments.
    Jon, what you're really asking us is whether you absolutely positively have to do the job right. In other words, is the lens/shutter combination worth putting any money into?

    I'm not acquainted with the 9"/5.6 Wolly copy lens and I don't know the standards to which you work. You're going to have to ask the lens whether it is good enough for you when set up incorrectly.

    Before you do much more, if the barrel has a diaphragm, put the cells back in, hang it in front of a 35 mm SLR, and shoot it wide open and stopped all the way down (f/11? f/16) at the distances you hope to use it to assess central sharpness when the lens is set up right. That test may convince you not to go farther.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin