Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,302   Posts: 1,536,247   Online: 732
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ky
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    25

    zeiss 21 cm orthometar f4.5

    greetings from the ohio river .
    I would ask if you could provide any info on the zeiss orthometar - is this a process lens ? it appears very clear . 21 cm and f4.5 -coverage ?
    thanks for your help.
    barry

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ky
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    25
    Ok --I've looked at vade mecum and it says it's an aerial lens -where does that lead me -what makes an aerial lens - thanks
    barry

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,364
    Good of you to have looked in the VM. If you'd looked a bit more you'd have found that there were short, e.g., 35 mm Orthometars, that covered 35 mm. And you'd have found that it is a plasmat type. You should be able to count on it covering at least 5x7.

    An aerial camera lens is a lens that was made, ideally optimized too, for shooting distant subjects. Some, not all, aerial camera lenses have a combination of some of these attributes: high resolution, usually at or near wide open; low distortion; even illumination. But not all have all of the attributes, and I wouldn't be surprised to learn that some have none.

    I expect, could be mistaken, that y'r Orthometar is uncoated. If so, flare may be a problem. Best way to find out is to use the lens.

    Good luck, have fun,

    Dan

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    34
    The Orthometar was, as its name indicates, made for photogrammetry, i.e. for measuring buildings and other distant objects. Thus the primary aim of its design was to reduce distortion to a level that's not been required in any other field of photography.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ky
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    25
    Dan and Jacobus,
    thanks for the help--yes it is uncoated , hopefully I can try it out this weekend .have a good day
    barry

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,364
    Uli, are you sure? I ask because I can't imagine anyone using a Contax with a 35 mm lens for photogrammetry, especially with the emusions available in the 1930s.

    Cheers,

    Dan



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin