Discussions: 42,939 | Messages: 578,175 | Members: 28,207 | Online: 261 | Chatroom: 1
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar

rocknrollbabe

by David William White
Enter the Gallery
Omega D2
Author: blade_o
72 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Large Format Cameras and Accessories > Why are you drawn to decay?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2007, 06:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
David Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,648
Default Why are you drawn to decay?

(Caveat: with tongue firmly in one cheek ...)

I hang out with four LF and ULF photographers. We are putting together a modest exhibition, and I've noticed something that I've noticed also in the larger population of you sheet film guys. Being a roll film man myself, I just have to wonder why so many LFers are drawn to decay, destruction, or derelict sites and buildings as subject matter. (Don't derail the thread to deny it - you "know" it's true!)

So, is it because the leather bellows on all of the old cameras smell so bad? It's just my theory ...

__________________
David Brown
In Nomine Papierus, Filmio, et Spiritu Argentine, AMEN
David Brown is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 06:38 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 581
Default

In my case I think it's because it takes so long to set up that the subject has decayed before the exposure is made!
rorye is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 06:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
roteague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 6,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Brown View Post
(Caveat: with tongue firmly in one cheek ...)

I hang out with four LF and ULF photographers. We are putting together a modest exhibition, and I've noticed something that I've noticed also in the larger population of you sheet film guys. Being a roll film man myself, I just have to wonder why so many LFers are drawn to decay, destruction, or derelict sites and buildings as subject matter. (Don't derail the thread to deny it - you "know" it's true!)

So, is it because the leather bellows on all of the old cameras smell so bad? It's just my theory ...

I've never noticed that before, but now that you mention it. I've always wondered why a lot of LF and ULF photographers seem to be drawn to what some call the "intimate" landscape; it is as if they aren't comfortable with the "grand" landscape. FWIW, I wish that "intimate" landscapes came more natural to me; I stuggle with it.
__________________
Robert M. Teague
www.visionlandscapes.com
www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

"A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer
roteague is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 06:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Coast, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,618
Default

Not all of them

Just between you and me, and they'll never admit to this, but it's because all that gear makes them lazy. Better to wallow in decay than to sweat bullets dragging the camera to distant amazing scenes. What a bunch of weinies!!!!!

Murray
__________________
_________________________________________
Note to self: Turn your negatives into positives.
MurrayMinchin is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 06:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,745
Default

it's kind of the nature of the medium, right (see also: Sontag's On Photography - yes, plugging it again! There's so much good stuff in there that people seem to miss - she suggests on several occasions this relationship)
__________________
if voting would make a difference, it would be made illegal.
Sparky is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 04-15-2007, 07:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
reellis67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,658
Default

I'd like to hear what everyone else says too actually. For me, I think it has something to do with the character of these things. Too many things today are mass produced and all look exactly the same and I just get tired of looking at them, where old places and old things have a more colorful appearance and a sense of mystery. Even if they are simply old it is often possible to just suspend disbelief and wonder about their past (we know about the reality, don't mess with the fantasy!). They exhibit fascinating textures and colors and shapes that are difficult to find elsewhere. Much of the machinery of the past exhibits it's own form of art, and hell, old machines are just fascinating! Or it could be that, as my wife says, I just live in the past all the time, either one...

- Randy
__________________
www.redisonellis.com
reellis67 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 07:04 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Monophoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Posts: 1,427
Default

Years ago, one of the regular writers in Popular Photography, Bob Schwalberg, coined the word "decrepitomania" to describe this phenomenon.

And yes, it's very true.

I think it has to do with the fact that old things have texture and character that meat and potatoes for LF photographers. And decaying old structures don't move - something that is a significant consideration when your average exposure time is measured in seconds.
__________________
Louie
Monophoto is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 07:08 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
jnanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,981
Blog Entries: 2
Default

wabi sabi
__________________
john nanian photography
jnanian is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 07:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Westminster, Maryland, USA
Posts: 977
Default

You mean there's other things to photograph?

Ha ha ha ha
__________________
When I grow up, I want to be a photographer.

http://www.walterpcalahan.com
Pinholemaster is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 04-15-2007, 07:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: California
Posts: 216
Default

For me, it seems to be a connection to the past. Someone else in history stood on this very spot and used this very tool I am photographing or worked in the building where I am photographing.

I feel by photographing objects of decay, especially where people have worked, somehow pays respect to what they did and somehow validates their time here on earth.

My father worked at Terminal Island in Southern California building ships during WWII. I have been trying to photograph in that area for years but never get permission to do so.


Gary
__________________
"If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people" Anonymous
Gary892 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 

  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using