I'm sure there is more than just me here who is inexperienced in LF. What would be really interesting would be to see some example photo's shot using different camera movements and some description of the effect and why you use it.
Any one willing to step up to the plate and show some of your techniques off and explain how they were achieved?
It could be a good article, but most introductions to the view camera have this sort of thing, like Steve Simmons' book, _Using the View Camera_; Ansel Adams' _The Camera_; Strobel's _View Camera Technique_; the Sinar manual, etc.
Just a quick answer: You use tilts, either back or front, to control depth of field. In other words, by tilting the front standard (which holds the lens) towards the scene, you can increase your depth of field without changing your aperture.
In the same way, you can use swings to do the same thing in a vertical plane. For example, if you are photographing a building that is at an oblique angle to the camera, swinging the front can put the entire wall of the building in focus.
The lens board can be elevated to control perspective and avoid the "building falling over backwards" effect, or converging verticals. Horizontal shift of either back or front can accomplish the same thing if you are not directly in front of the building you are photographing.
These are examples from architectural photography, but of course they could be applied to landscapes, product photography, etc. They are not usually employed for portraits, except for groups, where you can use the tilt to get an entire group in focus.
Having learned the effects of view camera movements in a commercial / table top settings there are a few things I can assure you of.
The movements you see in camerra advertisements will never be that extensive in the environment nor in a studio setting most of the time.
Whenever possible always use the rear standard to gain focus as it "steals" much less of the image circle to alter the plan of focus.
A formula I live by, examine the composition you have chosen, if it resembles a cube, then the only thing that will help with depth of field is F stops. If the composition resembles a rectangle in any way, then swing or tilt the "lens" in the "direction of the longest plane of the rectangle". Likewise, if necessary to correct perspective you can swing or tilt the rear standard in the "opposite direction of the longest plane of the rectangle".
ok, here's another question...I've had and used my 4x5 camera for 7 years, but the whole time with a 90mm lens, recessed board, bag bellows and short rail. Can i use a 210mm lens on this without changing anything....except for maybe a flat lens board? If not, how long a lens can I use without putting the regular bellows and longer rail on?