Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,949   Posts: 1,194,872   Online: 868
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    providence, ri
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    13

    Graphic focus question.

    I have a Crown Graphic with a 150mm Xenar. When I bought the camera the ground glass was broken, so I bought a replacement panel on ebay. I feel like my images are not as sharp as they should be upon enlargement. I was reading on Graflex.org that some Graphics originally came with a fresnel and that replacing the ground glass without a fresnel would change the plane of focus by roughly 1mm. Is this really enough to throw off critical focus at infinity, lets say, while shooting landscape stuff? Or is it more likely that this old Xenar is just not all that sharp (especially at the corners)? There definitely was not a fresnel on the camera when I bought it, but obviously I can't say anything about the previous four decades of its existence. Any help would be greatly appreciated including suggestions for affordable but sharp modern 150mm's or 90mm's that I could replace the Xenar with. Thanks.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    Xenar if stopped down and not using too much movements should be fine. Is the centre off? Or the corners?

    Is the camera true? The front standards not bent etc?

    How are you focussing? Do you check after you stop down?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    providence, ri
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    13

    focus

    I shot at f/32 (as far down as the lens goes). The camera appears to be in good all around condition, but obviously any Crown Graphic has seen some miles. I would say the corners are not as sharp as I want them to be. My previous experience with large format is with new lenses and cameras, so maybe I am just expecting way too much from older equipment.

    <todd>

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    No the Xenar and camera if in good state should focus just fine.

    Won't have all the coverage of the latest greatest lens. Won't have the latest coatings. But it should be sharp enough.

    http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/testin...0mm_thru_163mm

    There is a 150mm Xenar in those tests. Some of those lenses are likely older then yours and do fine for sharpness.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    providence, ri
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    13

    focus

    Sorry, just took a look at my Xenar. It is acutally a 135mm/4.7. The Xenar that came with the camera was a 150, but i replaced it with this lens. The front standard looks true and the lens is clean and clear. Perhaps I just suck at focusing my camera. It has a four bladed pop out hood so using a loupe is out of the question. Guess I'll shoot some more film and see how it looks. Thanks for the info and help.

    <todd>

  6. #6
    Jim Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rural NW Missouri
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,419
    Todd -- If your Crown has the common Graflok back, the pop out hood can be removed by depressing one of the catches on either side of the hood.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,571
    Todd, if the center is sharp then you don't have a focusing problem. The 135/4.7 Xenar doesn't quite cover 4x5 and will give you soft corners. CHECK CENTRAL SHARPNESS.

  8. #8
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    One more thing to check - installation sequence (looking at camera from rear) is fresnel screen FIRST (underneath) with patterned side facing back and the ground glass on top. Ground glass installed alone will be approx. 2 mm too close to the lens.

    Regards,

    David

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,571
    David, todd, Pacemaker Graphic focusing panels were delivered without and with fresnels. Same castings, same casting numbers. Those with have the bosses on which the ground glass sits machined down, those without don't.

    It isn't safe to assume that because there's no fresnel there used to be one.

    The OP should sacrifice a sheet of film to find out whether what seems to be in focus at the center of his camera's GG is also in focus on film. If I were doing it, I'd take the test shot at f/8.

  10. #10
    razzledog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne. Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    65
    Images
    6

    Ground glass position

    I have noticed that many Graflok backs have fresnels fitted but some do not. The difference of 1mm will throw your focus to the wind, (0.02mm is probably too much) so you may as well shoot pinhole! Measure the depth from the contact pads of the focusing panel to the glass, remembering that the screen faces rough side toward the lens.

    It should measure within a bee's dick of 5mm. The fresnels I've had are usually between 1-1.5mm thick and if installed, must have their rough side facing the glass....so they are assembled rough facing rough. The exact positioning of the ground glass is imperative if you want razor sharp negs. The fitting of a fresnel doesn't affect the focus plane, only helps to spread the light from the image.

    The Graflok focusing panels are machined out to suit either fresnel or not.

    Hope that helps.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin