Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,708   Posts: 1,548,606   Online: 1077
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    326

    Graflex conundrum

    I have wanted to try out a Graflex slr for sometime. Rather than spend big bucks from the start I bought one on ebay quite cheaply. I love it, it is a Series B 3x4, and in fine condition. It fits nicely in my shoulder bag and with 9 ddslides I am away on my bike. I also travel quite a bit and it is far easier to take compared to my Gandolfi . But, I am now looking toward up sizing to a 4x5 super d. My thoughts are that the availability of film is far larger, there are only 2 types of 3x4 as far as i can tell, and I can cut down other sizes, which can be laborious. etc..
    So my question is, should I stay at 3x4 or move up to 4x5? Not an earth shattering conundrum I know, but bugging me! Any Graflex slr users' thought gratefully received,
    Anton

  2. #2
    DBP
    DBP is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,883
    Images
    34
    All I can say is that the only thing that kept me from going the 3x4 route was that I wasn't willing to stock 3x4 in addition to 2x3, 9x12 cm, 4x5 and 5x7. But the 4x5's are relatively scarce and pricier, so I have neither so far.

  3. #3
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,392
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    438
    I ended up with a 3x4, and I like the camera's size. I was unable to find 3x4 film holders with the requisite slots on the side, so through careful Ebaying, I found a 2x3 Graflex rollfilm back with the 3x4 sized baseplate. Now I can shoot all those wonderful various emulsions that exist in 120 rollfilm with it. The 4x5 Super D is quite pricey, even in beat-up condition. The upside of the Super D (in either size) is that it is capable of firing a flash. Some out there have been modified to fire electronic flash instead of old flashbulbs.

    Cutting down to 3x4 is pretty easy, actually, because although you have to make 2 cuts, they're both the same size - 3/4". Just set the cutter, make the first cut, and rotate the film and cut again. Unless you have a burning urge to spend a couple hundred pounds, I'd stick with the 3x4.

  4. #4
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,325
    Images
    20
    4x5" gives you a lot more options and is a more significant improvement over 6x7cm than 3x4". I don't think I would get involved in shooting 3x4".
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  5. #5
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,392
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    438
    David- the actual film size is 4 1/4 x 3 1/4. Thus the need for two 3/4" cuts.

  6. #6
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,325
    Images
    20
    Yes, I realized that after I posted and edited my post.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    326
    Thanks for the input.
    Scott, did you have any luck with a polaroid back on your 3x4? (as discussed in an earlier apug thread I read). Is the cu-5 /DS-34 adaption the only way to go?

  8. #8
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,392
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    438
    I haven't gone down that road quite yet - I'm actually considering butchering the Polaroid back I have from my Hasselblad (it's the NPC back, not the Hassy brand back) and adapting it so I can shoot 669 on it. It's just a matter of making a mount for it that will keep the film plane in the right place. I've got to get together with a mechanically inclined friend of mine who hacks up old Polaroid 110s and turns them into 4x5 rangefinders to work on this.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,547
    Images
    77
    This isn't a knock on David, but until you hold and shoot a 3x4 Graflex, you might not understand how almost perfect it feels. It's just... balanced. The film holders are a bit scarce. I have a half dozen, plus a 6x9 roll film holder and a bagmag. It all works.

    The size difference between 6x7 and 3x4 is still significant. The lack of film is a PITB, not likely to be resolved anytime soon. I do have enough for another year or two of shooting at my present rate, but I am up the creek if I ever drag out the Kalart Press Camera and start doing any serious work with it. It won't take the 120 back.

    So.. Try and find a 4x5 at a reasonable price. That film will be around for a good long while. I wouldn't give up your 3x4 though. It's a nice camera.

    tim in san jose
    Where ever you are, there you be.

  10. #10
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,325
    Images
    20
    Well Weston certainly did more interesting work with the 3x4" Graflex than he did with the 4x5", but I think there were other factors there.

    My 5x7" Press Graflex also feels pretty good. They're remarkably well balanced cameras. I haven't used a 4x5".
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin