Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,500   Posts: 1,571,610   Online: 1264
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    John Bartley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    13 Critchley Avenue, PO Box 36, Monteith Ont, P0K1P0
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,397
    I have my great-uncles Kodak Autographic 3A (postcard size). Some time ago, just for the halibut, I put the lens on my Calumet 4x5 and took a close up, wide open photo of my hand holding a beer mug. The image was clear and sharp in the centre but progressed to being very soft, almost fuzzy at the edges. It did not leave any vignetting. I think the lens is a Kodak Eastman. I don't remember if it had any size printed on it ... I'll try to dig it out and see exactly what it is.

    cheers eh?

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    479
    Images
    8
    The 3A's were generally about 170mm I think. They came in a variety of types, usually meniscus, Rapid Rectilinear, or Tessar ... I've even seen a Dagor, but don't count on finding one of those easily. I haven't used a RR off of a 3A, but I've used them on other old folders, I really like the look they give.
    Nathan

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    144
    yeah, 170mm is what i roughly measured on my Ansco.

  4. #14
    sun of sand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    600
    Images
    10
    I took the meniscus out of a horizontal 3A Buster Brown and opened it up to
    f8
    It comes with a screw in metal hood so I also get f16 if I want that
    It's soft at f8. Everything is pretty soft
    Decent at f16 but no use for that really unless I want to leave it on the camera
    Have not made a print of only negative shot at f32 but certainly respectable for general use if need a cheap lens

    I took the lens out of a 2C brownie -postcard size- 130/131 film or something
    Opened it up to f8 and it is actually -quite- sharp in the center with everything getting progressively obliterated -extremely soft- towards corners
    (I don't know if normal for a lens like this but even stuff in the distant background is rendered sharper in the center)

    I like the crazy look of the brownie best but the 3A gives a nicer, diffused sort of look, I think. Haven't used them but a few times.

    I'll upload what I have for photos

    This 1st one was my first try on kodalith -I used the brownie lens to see if less contrast from the lens would help keep overall contrast down
    -don't mind the tones and highlights -scan was terrible
    It's much sharper in center than appears

    2nd is the 3A lens at f8 on Polaroid 55 -the print. My first 4x5 shot. I think I exposed for the negative ..but this is at least accurate of the look I get
    Last edited by sun of sand; 12-06-2007 at 01:53 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  5. #15
    matti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    652
    Images
    13
    Looks great. I just got a postcard sized folder with a 6 1/2 in RR-lens in a working shutter. Maybe I can clean it up tomorrow for some trials.
    /matti

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin