Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,536   Posts: 1,544,149   Online: 896
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    South Pasadena, CA USA
    Posts
    470
    I have been offered this for $850. The glass looks great, it is in what appears to be a pretty new #3 shutter. I am told it covers 8x10.

    I currently use the HUGE Schneider 360/5.6 as my normal 8x10 lens. This looks to be a good alternative at about one one-hundredth of the weight of the one I use.

    Is it a good deal? Would it be a good "normal" for the 8x10 and a slightly longer lens for the 5x7? I do all B&W so multicoating isn't an issue for me.

    Thanks.

    dgh
    David G Hall

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,284
    Images
    20
    It should be really sharp and would be normal for 8x10", but you won't get much movement for subjects at a distance. Artars have a relatively narrow angle of coverage, because they were designed to be used around 1:1.

    It would be a good longer lens for 5x7", though. Artars are best at the long end of whatever format you're using them with, since the larger focal lengths will offer plenty of extra coverage, and because they are relatively compact. I use a 19" Apo Artar on 8x10", for instance, but for a 12" lens I use a Dagor.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tijeras, NM
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,246
    A Dagor or a g-claron are both good normal lenses for 8x10 and easy to find. I think you can get the 305 g-claron in shutter for around 600$ brand new.
    art is about managing compromise

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    France
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    357
    David,

    another lens in a #3 shutter would not be a real alternative to your Symmar. Considder a process lens or the Nikkor-M

  5. #5
    c6h6o3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    3,179
    Images
    6
    I&#39;ve vignetted my 19" Red Dot Artar on the 8 x 10 with full front rise and some tilt to both standards. I don&#39;t think a 12" Artar would cover 8 x 10 at all well as the angle of coverage is < 50 degrees. You certainly wouldn&#39;t get any movements. If you have a 5 x 7 reducing back, though, or a 4 x 5 with enough bellows draw, snap it up. My Artar is my most cherished lens. I have the Artar, a Dagor, a Nikkor, two Rodenstocks and 4 Zeiss lenses for my Hasselblad. The Artar is superior to all the others in every way.
    Jim

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    David,
    I just received Midwest Photo&#39;s latest sales bulletin. They have a two 305 mm G Claron lenses in stock. The 8+ condition lens is listed at &#036;429.00 and the 9+ condition lens is listed at &#036;699.00.
    These are supposedly really sharp lenses and have excellent coverage. I know that the 355 mm G Claron will cover 12X20 format. I am not sure, but it seems that the 305 mm was represented to cover 11X14. Perhaps someone else can verify that. The only condition is that this is a F9 lens. So it is slower and dimmer but I shoot a F9 Dagor on my Deardorf and I can certainly see to focus. Hope this helps, good luck.
    Art is a step from what is obvious and well-known toward what is arcane and concealed.

    Visit my website at http://www.donaldmillerphotography.com

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    South Pasadena, CA USA
    Posts
    470
    OK guys,

    PLEASE be patient with me on this, because I know we covered it before. What&#39;s the difference between a red dot artar and a dagor? And which is sharper, contrastier, has more coverage, etc?

    Thanks.

    dgh
    David G Hall

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    747
    I&#39;ve got a few process lenses. All F/9. Focussing is easy. Aren&#39;t some of the older lenses F/18 at the wide end? Even checking focus at F/22 isn&#39;t a real hardship.

    The Dagor is the wider coverage. The Dagor is the "wide" design. I guess the Artar might be sharper overall.

  9. #9
    clay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Asheville, North Carolina
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,118
    Images
    8
    The 305 G-claron will cover 7x17, with some movements. It is a very sharp lens with a decent amount of coverage. My understanding is that it is a single coated symmetrical lens that is sort of the optical descendant of the dagor design. Badger Graphics still had some of these new last time I looked at pretty reasonable prices.

    The red dot artars have considerably less coverage, are also coated, and are incredibly sharp. I doubt if a 12" artar will be suitable for using on an 8x10 if you anticipate using any movements.

    Clay
    I just want to feel nostalgic like I used to.


    http://www.clayharmon.net - turnip extraordinaire

  10. #10
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,284
    Images
    20
    Artars are process lenses designed for reproducing flat artwork, maps, and such. Less coverage is better than more in that situation, because the lenses weren&#39;t designed for use at infinity, and at 1:1 excessive coverage can cause bellows flare. They do perform quite well at infinity, though. They&#39;re really sharp.

    Dagors are wide lenses. They have lots of coverage stopped down, and good contrast, even in uncoated versions, because they have only 4 glass-air surfaces. They can also function as convertibles in a pinch by removing the front cell to produce a lens about 1.75 x the focal length of the combined cells. I have two coated Gold Dot Dagors and one uncoated Ser. III Dagor, and they are great lenses. My 168mm/6.8 Ser. III will cover 8x10".

    If you wanted to put together an all Goerz lens kit, your widest lens might be a Wide-Angle Dagor, with a regular Dagor or three in the middle, and an Artar or two at the long end, since a wide angle of coverage is not as important with longer focal lengths relative to the format size.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin