Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,546   Posts: 1,572,971   Online: 1029
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    highpeak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    833
    Images
    71

    Please tell me what lens is it, Thanks

    My GAS is out of control, I dig everything on ebay now, what I got is a dirty brass lens in Unicum shutter. It has no name on it, just some labeling on the shutter says, "Bausch&Lomb OPT Co. PAT Jan, 6, 91. Aperture scale starts from F4, but I guess it could be F8 as to modern standard(I don't think this lens was made in 1991, is it 1891?)

    After a bit cleaning the lens is OK, no fungus or separation, few scratches. What surprised me is the shutter works after the two cylinders got cleaned. One more thing if it's helps to identify what it is, there is a "W.A." label on the aperture scale.

    Any info would be appreciated.

    Alex W.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,558
    Images
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by highpeak View Post
    My GAS is out of control, I dig everything on ebay now, what I got is a dirty brass lens in Unicum shutter. It has no name on it, just some labeling on the shutter says, "Bausch&Lomb OPT Co. PAT Jan, 6, 91. Aperture scale starts from F4, but I guess it could be F8 as to modern standard(I don't think this lens was made in 1991, is it 1891?)

    After a bit cleaning the lens is OK, no fungus or separation, few scratches. What surprised me is the shutter works after the two cylinders got cleaned. One more thing if it's helps to identify what it is, there is a "W.A." label on the aperture scale.

    Any info would be appreciated.

    Alex W.
    First off, what do you mean it has no name? "Bausch&Lomb OPT Co. "
    Are there two aperture scales? If so, the lens is designed to be used with the front or rear element removed for a different focal length. W.A. ... Wide Angle.

    Use it, abuse it, make it sing opera. You'll figure it out.

    tim in san jose
    Where ever you are, there you be.

  3. #3
    highpeak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    833
    Images
    71
    Tim, what I want to know is the name of the lens, not the manufacture of the lens. Sorry for the confusion.
    It has only one aperture scale.

    Yes I will use it, and name it afterwards

    Alex W.

  4. #4
    Whiteymorange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boston area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,322
    Images
    26
    Probably Rapid Rectilinear, surprisingly sharp when stopped down a bit. The unlabeled ones I have all cover 4x5. For some reason, the 5x7 and full plate seem to have that written on them, though this may just be the case with the ones I've found, or simply a matter of manufacturing dates.

  5. #5
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,476
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    437
    If it isn't a Rapid Rectilinear, given that it is Bausch & Lomb, it could be a Tessar design. If it is in fact a Tessar, the modern f4 is well within the realm of possibility for the maximum aperture. What is the diameter of the front element? More to the point, what is the diameter of the maximum aperture? Toss it up on a camera and focus to infinity to figure out the focal length. That coupled with the max aperture will give you the real fstop reading.

  6. #6
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,282
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    Probably not Tessar. I thought about an early Zeiss Anastigmat, but the patent year is wrong for all of them (!).

    So my guess is Rectilinear, too.

    If the aperture scale starts at 4 and goes on with 8, 16, 32 and so on, it's US. F:8 is a reasonable max aperture for a semi-wide Rectilinear.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  7. #7
    highpeak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    833
    Images
    71
    Thanks for the help guys.

    Scott, the lens is fairly small, the front cell is 2cm wide, according to the focal length I measured, which is close to 7 inches, F8 is a reasonable number.

    Ole, the aperture scale is marked as you described.

    Whiteymorange, it covers 4X5, I will try to see if it covers more than that.

    Looks like it's a Rapid Rectilinear, the reflection on each cell is two bright ones and one faint one.

    Alex W.

  8. #8
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,476
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    437
    If it is marked WA and the focal length is 7", then you're definitely in the 5x7/WP territory. More likely WP, as 210 (7") is considered normal for 5x7. Nice little lens there. Post some photos and show us!

  9. #9
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,418
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    156
    There are lots of those little rapid rectilinear lenses in unicum shutters floating about. If it were a tessar it would say so. The little unicum ones were the cheapies that came with the 1890's folders. You can assume the lenses were ground by Bausch & Lomb also. They're usually about 165mm focal length, the diagonal of 3 1/2X5 or close. Stick it on a 5X7 and tax it a little.
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san jose, ca
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,558
    Images
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by TheFlyingCamera View Post
    If it is marked WA and the focal length is 7", then you're definitely in the 5x7/WP territory. More likely WP, as 210 (7") is considered normal for 5x7. Nice little lens there. Post some photos and show us!
    Actually Scott, 210 is about 8 1/4"; 180 or so is a 7" lens, just on the wider side (but not much) for 5x7.


    tim in in jose
    Where ever you are, there you be.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin