Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,685   Posts: 1,482,258   Online: 1057
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    1,028

    bright viewfinder is not necessarily best

    Some years ago I put a bosscreen on my technikardan. It made a big difference to the viewfinder brightness but I've always found it difficult to focus exactly.
    I just put back the original Linhof ground glass and using a 45 reflex viewer in dim light just after sunset, I was able to focus really accurately even though it is far less bright than the bosscreen.
    The crop is from a notice board to the left of the arched church door and is at 100% of scan resolutoin which was done at 3200dpi unsharpened. On the neg with a 6x loupe, I can read most of what is on that notice board so I'm really pleased I put the old GG back. It just seems to snap into focus unlike the bosscreen.
    Attachment 10227Attachment 10226
    Last edited by rob champagne; 08-11-2008 at 03:04 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  2. #2
    darinwc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,014
    Images
    157
    why was the boss screen harder to focus? was it just not sharp or was there a 'hot spot'

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Shooter
    Plastic Cameras
    Posts
    1,028
    It's because the granularity in the linhof gg is either in focus or not. There seems to be a point with the linhof glass that it just pops into focus which is obvious. With the bosscreen a little either side of focus is difficult to detect, especially in dim light. I seemed to get more images slightly off focus with the bosscreen. It could just be me but I'm pleased with going back to the linhof gg. I should have done it long ago.

  4. #4
    gbenaim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    403
    Images
    15
    I had a similar experience w an Beattie Intenscreen and then a regular satin snow gg. There was probably a 2 stop difference, but the satin snow was much sharper.

  5. #5
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,942
    I have had this same experience with a Intenscreen. The brighter a screen is made, the closer it gets to an 'impossible-to-focus' aerial image.

    I remember using a Beaulieu movie camera in which the focusing screen could flip out of the way, so you could have the best of both worlds

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Tucson Az
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    226
    I think that has something to do with the use of a Fresnel; It creates a distinct spiral pattern that is almost impossible to get a sharp focus through. I can see how that would definitely be a problem if you are making enlargements.

    yours;

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    453
    Same experience with a Maxwell versus Ebony. I like the Ebony better because it "snaps" into focus. Granted the Maxwell is about 1/2 to a stop brighter, but it does not "snap" into focus. I think a lot of people want a "TV screen" with no granularity, but don't realize the effect granularity has on determining accurate focus.

    That said, a Maxwell for a wide angle may likely be a good thing.

    Cheers,

    Steve



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin