|
|
|
-
hi everybody thanks for all your replys i will use the smaller part with a reel cant wait to get cracking thanks once again ,wayne
-
Hi Wayne !
Do you own film tanks from Jobo in the 1500 serie ?
If yes, get the funnel from the top of the 1500 tank, put it in the top of the 2800 tank, replacing the beaker, then get the center core of the 1500 tank that is long enough for the 2800 tank and voila ! You've got a 2521 tank ...
All parts are standard and few in numbers, so the whole system is flexible ! Clever !
-
Lee, that is interesting about the flow pattern with the 2509 original reels and the later with the clips.
I have the first model CPE2 with the two speeds. I use the bottom of the 2840 drum, one original 2509 reel, the duo centre core from the 1520 tank, the 1500 tank funnel (as mentioned by Georges) and I run it on the slow speed for all film developing.
I've developed 4x5 film in E6, C41, B&W reversal, B&W films of all persuasions and Kodak colour print film, which is C41 process but you expose it with a colour neg in an enlarger to end up with a 4x5 transparency.
I have had no agitation or flow mark problems with any films. I would expect to see density differences with either E6 or C41 print film if there were flow problems.
Those E6 and colour print films were made for commercial purposes over a period of about 8 years, for a couple of local professional photographers. They used me to process their films, rather than the pro-labs because of my consistency.
I also submitted my 4x5 C41 print film transparencies to two agencies, one in Australia, the other in the UK. I never had stuff rejected because of any developing problems, content though, is another matter. 
The only time I have have problems with a 2509 reel is if you either load 6 sheets at a time, or, you load two sheets on adjoining slots. I always load 4 sheets, using the inner and outer slots only.
Mick.
-
 Originally Posted by Mick Fagan
Lee, that is interesting about the flow pattern with the 2509 original reels and the later with the clips.
Mick,
I purchased the CPE-2 when I was in Germany for a year in '82-83. Our landlady said I could develop film in the bathroom when we made our arrangements. After my first roll of film, she said I had to use the unheated basement. So I was forced to do something like the CPE-2 in order to develop film at all. The CPE-2 produced flow marks on 35mm, 120, and 4x5 using the developers I tried, which would have been Rodinal 1:100 and HC-110. This was when Jobo was recommending the slow rotational speed and not mentioning the 5 minute presoak they came up with later. I also tried the 4 sheet arrangement you use. Within 18-24 months Jobo were pushing a new processor and tanks, another $1500 minimum investment as the way to be assured of highest quality 4x5 results. In the meantime, after 4 months, we got a long delayed first paycheck from the German university system and moved to a place where I had a heated bathroom to work in. I never found the Jobo worth pursuing for film after the initial poor experience. It was great for color printing with Cibachrome and Kodak EP-2 materials later.
Years later, when checking on the internet, I found that Jobo had changed all their recommendations, fast rotational speed, minimum 5 minute presoak, a new reel 2509N with the deflector/retainer clips, and they redesigned the spiral reels as well. Mine just have radial spokes, no solid spiral channels, and those produced standing waves at slow speed, clearly visible as flow marks on 35mm and 120, with varying spacing with the widening radial spoke spacing between the inner and outer parts of the reel.
I did a quick experiment with Rodinal 1:100 a couple of years ago, Pan-F replacing the original Panatomic-X, Rodinal 1:100, same reels as before, but with the 5 minute presoak and faster rotational speed recommended a year or two after I got my setup. Those negatives came out fine. But with a heated darkroom, I just do stainless hand tanks because the setup, breakdown, drying, etc involved with the Jobo is too much bother, and I don't have enough room to leave it in a state of readiness.
I'm not anti-JOBO. I just had a combination of early, insufficient instructions, and bad luck with my chosen film/developer combinations in a system that I was "forced" into buying by circumstances beyond my control. In the days before the internet, keeping up with these sorts of issues was tougher. I also bought in Germany and moved back to the US, so I wasn't registered with Jobo USA and didn't get the newsletters they were sending out that addressed all these issues. Other folks obviously have had great success with the system at all stages, and the same kinds of vagaries are also rife with hand tanks, as the many threads here on APUG show. I still have to think that others were having the same issues as I had, given the design changes to the reels and the changed recommendations for presoak and rotation speed. BTW, Jobo USA was great about advice and supplying me with the proper transformer, fuse, and heating element as parts to convert my CPE-2 to US AC power myself.
Lee
-
Lee, once again very interesting. I agree that information was extremely scarce in the early 80's which is when I bought my Jobo. magazines and brochures were about the only way to get information.
I have never used a pre-wet for any B&W or colour film processed with my Jobo. I did use a pre-wet for colour printing (EP2) but eventually stopped that, when flocculant in the water caused problems with Agfa paper.
I don't particularly like Rodinal and HC110 has never been much used by me either. Generally I have nearly always used D76 or ID11. Currently, and for the last 18 years, I have used D76 from scratch.
Mick.
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
 Originally Posted by Mick Fagan
I don't particularly like Rodinal and HC110 has never been much used by me either. Generally I have nearly always used D76 or ID11. Currently, and for the last 18 years, I have used D76 from scratch.
I like Rodinal 1:100 with slow films like Panatomic-X, Pan-F, Efke 25, and it was the first developer that I liked with TMX (first version). I also added a little sodium sulfite during that period. I used HC-110 with VP-120 and B&W sheet film. I love D76 1:1 with Tri-X. I tend to match developers to certain films and shooting styles. I chose liquid concentrates for the year in Germany to make life easier, and before I lost the use of a warm bathroom, not to match the unforseen Jobo processing. I was just trying to cope and get some work done with what I had on hand. Getting too far off topic here.
It is much nicer these days to have the internet for searching out up to date information. Or out of date info, like a couple of the films I've just mentioned. I scarfed up all the info I could find on the Jobo USA website after I got back into shooting more B&W again a few years ago, coinciding with my two boys getting old enough for me to get into the darkroom for enough time to process a roll or two, and show them the ropes as well.
Lee
|
|