Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,941   Online: 947
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Andrew Moxom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Keeping the British end up in Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,741
    Images
    256

    Rodenstock 127mm Ysaron or Kodak Ektar 127mm

    Which of these two lenses would give me more coverage with less fall off at the edges? I already have the Ektar and notice the fall off quite a bit, but have a lead on a Ysaron version with prontor press shutter for a good deal. It may worth getting even if just for the prontor press shutter.

    So what sayeth the gurus on better coverage and what would be sharpest?

    Thanks
    Please check out my website www.amoxomphotography.com and APUG Portfolio .....

  2. #2
    waynecrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The Swamp
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,005
    Images
    2
    W.A. Crider

  3. #3
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,531
    Blog Entries
    1
    The Ektar lens is superior to the Ysaron in design nd performance. The Ektar stopped downto 22 should cover 4x5 with some movements.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Films NOT Dead - Just getting fixed![/FONT]

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    1,004
    IMHO both will cover 4x5 though without much wiggle room. Both are very nice lenses for what they are (and they are both quite sharp and well corrected for color!) My uncoated wartime production 127 Ektar is a keeper. I had a 127 Ysaron and gave it to a friend, then I bought a second 127 Ysaron just for the shutter so I'll have something in which to mount the $40 270mm G Claron I'll win on ebay some day in the future

    Keep in mind that the 127 Ektar was used primarily on press cameras like Speed Graphics which were usually shot handheld, so the ability of any usable movements were really a non-issue.

    If what you want is a cheap lens, both the Ektar and Ysaron are excellent if availability of movements aren't an issue. OTOH if you want movements there are plenty of lenses going for not much more that will give you much greater satisfaction. I'd recommend checking out a 120 Angulon.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    My 127mm Kodak Ektar is a Tessar type lens that came together with my 3.25" X 4.25"
    Crown Graphic. It covers the 3.25" X 4.25" format ok...

    My 127mm Rodenstock Ysaron is also a Tessar design and it also covers the 3.25" X 4.25" format ok...
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  6. #6
    Wade D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Jamul, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    856
    Images
    3
    I have both of those lenses. They cover the field on my Speed Graphic just fine and are both sharp. They also cover the limited movements on my Crown View without much of a problem when stopped down enough.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    79
    I have both, and and honestly can't tell the difference in image. Little/no room for movements, but great almost point and shoot lenses for a speed graphic.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin