Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,941   Online: 960
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    666
    Images
    30
    I have a Caltar HR 5.6 90mm (Topcon) that works fine on my Wista using a flat board. It only just fits the lensboard aperture, and I have more coverage than the fixed bellows will let me use. I am really happy with it. It does mean I step down 77mm filters for other lenses. That may be an advantage with a slower lens.
    I feel, therefore I photograph.

  2. #22
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,270
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    When you consider wide angle lenses, the important criteria are:

    Weight
    Bulk
    Coverage
    max Aperture
    Price.

    I use a 90mm f:6.8 Angulon and a 90mm f:8 Super Angulon (as well as a half-dozen antiques, but that's a different discussion). The plain Angulon wins hands down on Weight, Bulk, Price and Aperture, but loses a little on Coverage. That's why I use both - I quite often use 5x7", and even on 4x5" I keep needing more movements.

    One lens I would give serious thought (if I were looking for another 90mm lens) is the Congo WA 90mm f:6.3. As far as I can see it's a double-Gauss construction, which is capable of very good performance. The Coverage is less than the "wasp-waist" modernish lenses like the SA (and even more the SA XL), but Weight, Bulk, and Price are comparable to the old 90/6.8 Angulon. And max Aperture is a fraction better than that, too...

    There's a third type of lens, too - exemplified by the Super Symmar Xl 80mm. I have never used one, nor even seen one, but it's intermediate in terms of illumination and only marginally better (IMO) in terms of overall sharpness. And the price is beyond comparison! If I knew I needed one, I would buy one. But so far I haven't missed one - even if my only LF 80mm lens is a WA Rectilinear from 1899...
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  3. #23
    mealers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Plymouth, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    117
    Images
    16
    I use a 4x5 Shen Hao and I also have a 90mm f/5.6 Super Angulon.
    To be honest I really didnt enjoy using the 90mm with the standard bellows, it was usable and you did have movements but it was way too restrictive for my liking. I bought the bag bellows and it has made things alot easier.
    My advice, buy a 90mm and try the standard bellows and then make your own mind up.

    BTW I also have the same Schneider lens as you, the bag bellows also works well with that lens.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    808
    Images
    70
    I have used the both Nikons f/8 & f4.5, both Fujinons the f/8 & f/5.6 and the Schneider 90mm Super Angulon XL. For pure coverage the Schneider XL wins hands down, but I found it to be a real problem carry any distance in the field.

    The nikons were okay, but I didnt really care for the color and contrast too much, though the f/8 was sharp. I ended up keeping both of the Fujinons. For me they had better flare control and I prefered the color rendition. Then again I am biased, I really like pretty much all Fuji lenses.

    Gary
    Build a man a fire and he will be warm for hours.
    Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin