Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,941   Online: 971
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Kata HB 207

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    17

    Kata HB 207

    Has anyone used the above as a bag for their LF setups? I am considering it, the other choice is the Lowepro Computrekker AW or Plus AW.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Fixer View Post
    Has anyone used the above as a bag for their LF setups? I am considering it, the other choice is the Lowepro Computrekker AW or Plus AW.
    Not me! No way I'd try to drag that sort of thing up a mountain.

    My current LF (8x10) bag:

    http://www.gregorypacks.com/us/?opti...details&cid=21

    Gregory Baltoro 70

    Volume 70 liters

    Weight empty 2.52 kg

    Can comfortably carry up to 25 kg

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    17
    Not going to climb any mountains. It just for moving the camera around. Am using a Magmum AW now and its killing it. Mines a 4 X 5 Omegaview 45F. I have managed to pack it down into its various components. But would like a comfy pack to lug it along. What don't you like abt the Kata or the Lowepro? Is it the Ergonomics?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    286
    Images
    3
    I have a Kata Panda 401 which I use for LF, mostly 4x5. It is sturdy, a good size, well made, and conveniently divided into two compartments. There is a little flap thing which holds my camera in the lower section, with open space on the bottom and sides, which helps to protect from impact. Very happy with the bag.

    I have my 8x10 in a Kelty Redwing backpack, which is good, but doesn't provide the kind of protection that I get from the Kata.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Fixer View Post
    Not going to climb any mountains. It just for moving the camera around. Am using a Magmum AW now and its killing it. Mines a 4 X 5 Omegaview 45F. I have managed to pack it down into its various components. But would like a comfy pack to lug it along. What don't you like abt the Kata or the Lowepro? Is it the Ergonomics?
    Yes, the ergonomics. I do go up and down mountains with my LF cameras.

  6. #6
    CGross
    I have an HB-207 which I have loaded down with my Hasselblad setup and I do like it. It is not as comfortable as my Photobackpacker Kelty pack which carries my Sinar F 4x5, nor as comfortable as an Expedition 7 bag I have. The padding on the shoulder harness could be better and the waist belt is not designed for skinny people!! And it does not carry a tripod well.
    I like it because of the configuration and protection I can get with it and the yellow makes it easy to see things. It looks huge on your back though...kind of like a turtle shell!!

    I think there would be better and cheaper options for carrying your Omega. For example the Kelty packs that Bruce sells at Photobackpacker.com are very nice and I think the price is right.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    17
    What abt the computrekker AW plus? The Kata and Lowepro are the option i have access to.. Getting the kelty or the photobackpackers will be too expensive.

  8. #8
    CGross
    I have no experience with the Computrekker AW. Lowepro packs have a very good reputation.
    If you have access to them before you buy then I would take your gear and see which one would fit it best and feel the most comfortable.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin