Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,956   Posts: 1,522,901   Online: 1179
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    121

    Lens equivalancy to 35mm

    I heard a while ago that if you take the lens and divide by 3, you get the 35mm equivalent. I have used this as my rule of thumb for quite some time. However, I was just looking at the 300mm lens I currently have mounted on my 8x10, and IMHO it doesn't look like a 100mm zoom on a 35mm ...

  2. #2
    tiberiustibz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tufts University
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,750
    Images
    5
    I believe the ratio is more like 8.

  3. #3
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    First of all, the factor of 3 is used for 4x5" to 35mm, NOT for 8x10" to 3500m. Double it for 8x10".

    Second, the aspect ratio is different enough that the "equivalency" is of limited useability.

    Third, at moderate distances the bellows extension needed to focus a LF camera (beyond infinity focus) throws the whole "equivalence" off.

    A 300mm lens on 8x10", focussed at infinity, has a focal length slightly shorter than the film diagonal. So would a 40mm lens on a 35mm camera.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Westminster, Maryland, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,504
    The secret is to forget about 35 mm equivalence. Learn to see the world via the lenses for your 8x10. With practice it will become intuitive.
    When I grow up, I want to be a photographer.

    http://www.walterpcalahan.com/Photography/index.html

  5. #5
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    3,946
    Exactly what Walter said.

  6. #6
    wiltw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    SF Bay area
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    732
    Measure the height of the frame in millimeters. Now use that number as the divisor, and the lens FL as the dividend...e.g. 150mm lens on 4x5 is 150 / 90 = 1.66, so this would be equivalent on 135 format to 24 * 1.66 = 40mm FL

    This technique is what Sinar uses.

  7. #7
    mhanc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    267
    Images
    10
    There is a great spreadsheet on the ALPA website with many photographic calculations including 35mm [or other] equivalent lens.

    http://www.alpa.ch/index.php?path=press/downloads

    If I could only afford their cameras...

  8. #8
    Martin Aislabie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Stratford-upon-Avon, England
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,413
    As ever – nothing is straight forward in LF

    There is no good hard lens equivalence between 35mm & LF

    The aspect ration of 35mm is 3:2, with LF its 5:4

    Get the vertical equivalence right and the horizontal is off & visa versa

    There are several ways to do it:-

    Guess - it’s somewhere between 3 & 3.6 at infinity compared to 5x4 (double that for 10x8) but the ratio goes out of the window as you rack out the bellows.

    Experiment - find a friend who has a bunch of lenses and try them out for size to find some that suit you

    Scale up or down from a Lens you already own in that format (the ratio of 1.5 to 2:1 seems a reasonable spread in LF – you can then go back and fill in the gaps as your needs require)

    Good luck

    Martin

  9. #9
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,210
    Images
    148
    Just use the rough rule of thumb Ole & others mention 3x for 5x4 & 6x for 10x8 formats.

    As Brad & Walter say it's not really that relevant it's how you see with that format.

    Ian

  10. #10
    mjs
    mjs is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,105
    Images
    2
    Get yourself a piece of dark colored cardboard and cut a 4" x 5" hole in the center. Glue a piece of string, 12" or more long, to the bottom center of the card. In other words, make yourself a viewing card. For 4x5, the distance from your dominant eye (measured from your cheek is close enough,) to the cardboard is the focal length of the lens which would reproduce the view. Double the measurement for the equivalent 8x10 lens. Now you can walk around and expose "air film" all day, and in the process learn what focal length lenses your vision gravitates toward.

    Mike

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin