Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 72,533   Posts: 1,598,697   Online: 901
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,886
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    123

    Kalart side-mounted rangefinder on my speed?

    Well, I've been wanting to do some handheld shooting with my Pacemaker, and I want to get a rangefinder. However, I was looking at a picture of the Kalart side mounted rangefinder I want, and I don't think it will fit my camera... If you look at the pictures, the rod that attaches the cam to the focusing rails seems to require a hold in the side of the camera that I don't have.







    Happy to provide additional photos at your request.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    692
    That looks exactly like my 1953 Pacemaker Speed Graphic. I have the side mounted rangefinder and it works fine. I'll take it out tonight and do a bit of looking around.
    Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to buy a body with a working rangefinder?

  3. #3
    BradS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    S.F. Bay Area, California
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,088
    Images
    1
    looking at the camera from the front, open it up and look inside the box in the upper left hand side - where the RF would be mounted. There should be a hole in the box that is covered by the leather.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,055
    Images
    3
    Do you have a 2x3 or 4x5 (or 3x4 for that matter)? Each one needs a different arm. Make sure you get the right one. The one you show is for a 4x5.

    As has already been said, the hole should be there. I don't think I've ever seen a Pacemaker without a Kalart (except the top RF models). I own a 1st year Century Graphic that has no Kalart - the hole is in the body but covered by the "leather" (originally, the Kalart was an option on the Century)

    Dan

  5. #5
    EASmithV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,886
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    123
    Quote Originally Posted by Venchka View Post
    That looks exactly like my 1953 Pacemaker Speed Graphic. I have the side mounted rangefinder and it works fine. I'll take it out tonight and do a bit of looking around.
    Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to buy a body with a working rangefinder?

    Yes, I can see a hole on the inside covered up by the outside. Is it rare to have a SG without a rangefinder? I don't want to destroy something unique... And I don't like putting holes in perfect covering... I found a rangefinder for sale for like 25 bucks... If you know where I can buy a SG body with a rangefinder for 25 bucks, PM me so I can pay you =D

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,055
    Images
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by EASmithV View Post
    Is it rare to have a SG without a rangefinder? I don't want to destroy something unique... And I don't like putting holes in perfect covering... I found a rangefinder for sale for like 25 bucks... If you know where I can buy a SG body with a rangefinder for 25 bucks, PM me so I can pay you =D
    I'd say it's unusual but I doubt it makes it especially valuable (particularly as a user camera). If the covering is really that perfect (and the rest of the camera to match), you might want to display it and find a more battered one to use. I use my RF-less Century as a field camera - I took off the viewfinder as well so it's as small as a 2x3 Graphic can get and it's light.

    $25 for a Kalart is probably the high end of what I'd be willing to pay for one and it had better be nice and bright - I have 2 or 3 lying around (and one which is NIB) and that's about what I'd want for one but I'm not sure I'd get it. Is the photo you attached the one you'll get? There were several variations on mounting for them and I think this is one of the newer ones (and better).

    Dan



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin