Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,561   Posts: 1,545,290   Online: 765
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,402
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    155

    Soft Focus with a Bausch & Lomb Tessar??

    (also posted for my friends over at LFForum)

    This weekend I made some soft focus images with one of the most ignored of all lenses. Nobody cares for old B&L Tessars. Why is that?

    If you like soft focus, click on the link to see what an $80 lens can do. Let me know what you think?

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com/Ba...ndLTessar.html
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    53
    Images
    2
    Nice photos! Great tones and bokeh, well done.

  3. #3
    BlueLemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Denmark
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    83
    Images
    1
    I have this B&L 1C on my bookshelf - bought it as part of lot from UK 6 months ago.

    I will try it out

  4. #4
    df cardwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Dearborn,Michigan & Cape Breton Island
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,342
    Images
    8
    Jim

    When studio portraitists ventured outdoors a hundred years ago,
    they gleefully ditched their brass honkers and embraced Tessars, and the other anastigmats.
    First, they could focus and shoot wide open. Second, if they needed to 'soften' the image, they simply racked the lens out to put the offending sharpness between the subject and the camera.

    It seems the prejudice against Tessars (and B&L were as good or better then Jena at any given time) began in the Internet Era, when lots of folks could talk about stuff, without ever seeing the resuts.

    The reasoning against Tessars goes like this:

    A hard to find lens has to be better than a common lens, yes ?
    After all, if a Tessar was any good, then why did they make so many of them ???

    Forty two ears ago, I was a teenage kid helping out a retired master photographer of the old school. I was going out with a TLR to make some snaps, and he tossed me a roll of Verichrome Pan. I turned my nose up at it, that crap film I had used in a Brownie. I said, "I'm not going to use that stuff, I'm going to get some Plus-X !"

    The old man sighed, and asked, "If Kodak is going to sell plastic cameras with a plastic lens that everybody has to get good pictures with, are they going to use their worst film or their BEST film ?" I felt suitably idiotic, accepted the VP120, remembered my manners and thanked him, and once I began to respect the film began to get great images from VP.

    That's the same thing as the Tessar. Great lens. Wonderful portrait lens. Great find, Jim.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    local
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,340
    Blog Entries
    5
    Images
    50
    hi jim

    beautiful work.
    i love the tessar i have with my slr!

    john
    silver magnets, trickle tanks sold
    artwork often times sold for charity
    PM me for details

  6. #6
    Whiteymorange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Boston area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,289
    Images
    26
    Long been a Tessar fan. They can be plenty sharp when they need to be (at least my Rollieflex 3.5 certainly is) cheap and plentiful. Thanks to you now, Jim, the rest of the world will start bidding them up! Beautiful shots, though... Thanks for sharing them.

  7. #7
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,367
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    435
    Glad I got my 16" f4.5 Tessar monster before Jim did this. Maybe in a year or two I can pay off the house with it

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,101
    Images
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by df cardwell View Post
    After all, if a Tessar was any good, then why did they make so many of them ???
    Yes, and why was the list price for a 30 cm f4.5 Zeiss Tessar 450 Mark back in 1911, when a 30 cm Goerz Dagor was only 305 Mark?

    Very nice photos Jim.

  9. #9
    jimgalli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tonopah Nevada
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    3,402
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by Uhner View Post
    Yes, and why was the list price for a 30 cm f4.5 Zeiss Tessar 450 Mark back in 1911, when a 30 cm Goerz Dagor was only 305 Mark?

    Very nice photos Jim.
    Thanks everyone. So if you run 450 mark through an inflation and $$ conversion what does it turn out to be in 2009 $$ besides half again more than the Goerz?
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep..to gain that which he cannot lose. Jim Elliot, 1949

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,183
    Images
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by jimgalli View Post
    If you like soft focus, click on the link to see what an $80 lens can do. Let me know what you think?

    http://tonopahpictures.0catch.com/Ba...ndLTessar.html
    Probably within a few weeks these will be selling for $400 on ebay.
    The universe is a haunted house. -Coil
    .

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin