Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,524   Posts: 1,543,842   Online: 892
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    34

    Is uncoated Zeiss Tessar 150mm f:3.5 any good?

    A friend offered me this lens (sn: 1,5xx,xxx) mounted in compur dial shutter. Is it worth getting? I have already had a 180mm heliar which I like. How different is it than its little brother f:4.5?

  2. #2
    mjs
    mjs is offline

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,106
    Images
    2
    I suppose that it depends on how you define 'good'. Since it's uncoated it's going to have a different 'look' than a coated lens; probably a little softer, lower in contrast but shadows will be more open. Most photographers prefer coated or multicoated lenses for a variety of reasons but I have a 1939 Rolleiflex with an uncoated tessar lens which I absolutely adore: b&w looks very dated, vintage in appearance. With color film, things look very different than with a modern lens. It's hard to describe but hue and saturation are lower and skies especially have a look that I really, really like. Your mileage may vary! I think that your best option is to try the lens out for a while, if possible, see if it works for you.

    Mike

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    local
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,286
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images
    49
    i have an uncoated 21cm 3.5 tessar in a barrel.
    it is my favorite lens these days.
    if the price is right, grab it!

    john
    silver magnets, trickle tanks sold
    artwork often times sold for charity
    PM me for details

  4. #4
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,268
    Images
    148
    SN: 1,5xx,xxx should be in a rim-set Compur as it dates from 1934 which is 5 years after the Compur was redesigned.

    I was using a 135mm Tessar on my Crown Graphic and found that edge & corner sharpness only became reasonable at f16 and good at f22. The lack of coating gives a rounded tonality, different to modern coated versions I found the major difference was alack of micro contrast when I compared prints made with it to those from my Symmars, and more recently 50's T coated CZJ f4.5 150mm Tessar and modern Xenar f5.5 150mm (21st C SN).

    The extra speed of the f3.5 is likely to be at the expense of edge/corner sharpness, there was also an f6.3 version of the Tessar's.

    If your Heliar is uncoated the Tessar should be similar in its results.

    Ian



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin