Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,682   Posts: 1,548,527   Online: 872
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Just north of the Inferno
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    750
    Images
    27
    O.k. I want to buy some old lense for the 4x5s. Something nice and soft to work with. I have some options here though

    1 - A 6" DARLOT OPTICIAN BRASS (BARREL)WITH F-STPS ON 3 LEVERS (60 MOUNT)

    2 - A 4.5" F8 BAUSCH&LOMB SYMMETRICAL UNICOM SHUTTER (BRASS)(35 FLANGE)

    3 - A Voigtlaender Wide Angle Euryscop VII Lens

    I think the last one is an 8x10, but it could work for my 4x5s.

    Ideally I want something with a "holgaish" look to it. Lots of swirly stuff outside the center sweet spot.

    And advice?[/url]
    Official Photo.net Villain
    ----------------------
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]DaVinci never wrote an artist's statement...[/FONT]

  2. #2
    cjarvis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    183
    Images
    26
    You could also try a really old Rapid Rectillinear. Believe it or not I had a Montgomery Ward RR (c. 1897) that had the exact look you're describing (example: http://www.redhillphoto.com/portfoli...andoah8102.jpg - it's an 8x10, but a RR with a shorter focal length might be what you'd like). If you get something that covers 8x10, the "sweet spot" might be entirely encompass 4x5, which would kind of negate the effect you're looking for.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Sub 35mm
    Posts
    16,413
    Blog Entries
    2
    i would second rapid rectilinear.
    there are a few on fee-bay right now ... - pretty cheep too

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...category=15248

    you might also think about buying a folder and pulling the lens off of it. they usually have meniscus lenses which give the effect you want ..

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Just north of the Inferno
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    750
    Images
    27
    I do have an old 1912 Kodak Anistigmat that I am going to have mounted. COmes from the old 1A I think. But I worry that the anastigmat might be TOO good....
    Official Photo.net Villain
    ----------------------
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]DaVinci never wrote an artist's statement...[/FONT]

  5. #5
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,319
    Images
    20
    It's not unlikely that the Darlot is a Rapid Rectilinear design. I'm not sure about the others.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  6. #6
    juan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    St. Simons Island, Georgia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,643
    Images
    4
    I have an old Rapid Rectilinear from a junked folder. The shutter doesn't work, so I've thought of trying the lens on one of my Speed Graphics. Trouble is, the rear element is loose - shake it and the glass rattles, shifting about 1/8" in the mount. This lens is not worth sending to a shop for reglueing, so I'm thinking of doing it myself.

    Any reason a common contact cement or Super Glue wouldn't work? I also assume that the rear-most position would be correct.

    I'd like to see what effects this lens produces - maybe it will be hideously interesting.
    juan

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    264
    You could also take a modern lens and reverse one of the elements. The 180mm from a Mamiya TLR (I know, that's MF, not LF), if the rear element is reversed, is sharp at the center, with increasing blur towards the edges. It improves when stopped down, but is always softer along the outside. The only downside to this particular model is that it's miserable at infinity when rearranged this way.

    For large format, if you were to get a copy-camera lens (cheap enough to experiment with), and rearrange it, you'd have the advantage of modern shutter and variable formula.

    On the Other Other Hand, check out the book "Primitive Photography", which discusses how to make your own 19th century designs with cheap lenses and PVC pipe.

  8. #8
    cjarvis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    183
    Images
    26



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin