Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,951   Posts: 1,194,917   Online: 943
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    lilmsmaggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Hamley View Post
    Jeff,

    Yes very much. He says he has all the movement needed on 8x10 and that it's very sharp. He's a professional photographer so I value his opinion.

    Cheers, Steve
    I guess this question was just slow to form in my mind:

    With a maximum aperture of f11, does it become difficult focusing the image on the GG, or checking critical focus?

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    453
    I asked Don the same question, and he said yes it was relatively rather dim, but focusing was not a problem. And it's less than a stop darker than an Artar which is f:9.

    But what I discovered is that for many people, a bright image on the groundglass is the holy grail, even to the point of making focusing more difficult. If you're one of these, you'll likely not be happy with it, as it will be darker than equivalent process lenses and certainly much darker than the f:5.6 plasmats and the f:5.6 400mm Apo Tele-Xenar MRC. Small and bright don't go together, especially in longer focal lengths.

    Cheers, Steve

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    668
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Hamley View Post
    ...for many people, a bright image on the groundglass is the holy grail, even to the point of making focusing more difficult...
    How does a bright image end up being harder to focus than a dim one?

  4. #14
    jeffzeitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    57
    good question - I too would like to know the answer.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    453
    Sal,

    In my experience with a variety of fresnels and Ground glass, brighter means finer which means less of a "snap" into focus. Everything is a balance of course, and I've suspected that eyes and brains are more of a part of the GG/Fresnel/Loupe system that we give credit for. One of the "snappiest" screens was the Wehman plastic screen, but it was too dark for many in-the-field situations for me.

    Cheers, Steve

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    668
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Hamley View Post
    ...brighter means finer which means less of a "snap" into focus...
    I've used a number of different screens and, at least for me, the Maxwell is tops. I'm referring to the HiLux 4.7 for 4x5 and 5x7. It's fine, bright and "snaps" pretty well in combination with my eyes/brain. At the other extreme, a Beattie Intenscreen "snapped" a slight bit more, but was so coarse that one needed to "look past" the screen structure to have any idea what detail was present.

    Just today I put a 200mm Nikkor M on my SV57 (with Maxwell) to evaluate focus ease and coverage. Pointing it out the window, I had no trouble focusing without a dark cloth, despite the f/8 maximum aperture.

    Back to the Schneider 350mm. In this post

    http://www.largeformatphotography.in...78&postcount=5

    it was reported that the maximum marked aperture is f/11 but the lens actually opens up between 1/3 and 1/2 stop more, making for a bright, sharp ground glass image.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin