Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,699   Posts: 1,549,130   Online: 1129
      
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    124

    Sinar F1 for backpacking

    I've been looking for a field camera for backpacking, since my monorail encourages me to just take my medium format instead of lugging it up a 4000ft mountain, but someone suggested I look for a compact monorail to retain the movements of a full monorail but to make it more compact.

    I found a nice clean Sinar F1 kit on CL for $650 with a Schneider Symmar-S 210/5.6 and a handful of other nick nacks. I'm going to check it out tomorrow, but does anyone have any experience with these in terms of portability? I'd like for it to fit nicely into a backpack and not be too much a bother to lug around. The weight is fine with me, I'm more concerned with size.

    Could you also comment as to the quality of the camera overall? I see that it is a budget Sinar, but does it come across as a budget camera in real-world use?
    ~ Michelle

  2. #2
    2F/2F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,008
    Images
    4
    If you are going to lug a monorail, it is one of the best. It is solid, full featured, relatively lightweight, and breaks down fairly compactly with ease and speed. Believe it or not, my F-1 body with 12 inch rail and standard rail clamp (there is a smaller and lighter low profile one I would get if I was lugging it all the time) weighs less than my Super Technikas sans lenses. The reason the F-1 is so light has a lot to do with its front standard being a multipurpose standard, as opposed to the focusing standard of the F-2. If you can do everything you need to do with coarse focusing (e.g. if you will focus mostly on objects fairly far from the camera and/or use extensive depth of field for everything), you can even use MP standards for both rails to cut weight and bulk even more. I'd also use a bag bellows as a standard bellows for hiking with a 210.

    As for quality, worry not, my friend.......
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  3. #3
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,321
    Images
    20
    There are ways of making an F/1/2 packable. Leave the rail clamp on the tripod and don't use a quick release, because the rail clamp is itself a quick release for the rail. This saves pack space significantly. The camera is sturdiest with the bellows compressed into a block or flat for the bag bellows. You can mount the camera on a 6" rail for storage, then screw in the 12" basic rail when you want to use it, and you don't need to remove the short rail.

    The Alpina and A/1 cameras were designed to be more packable, with their thin flat rail, but then the accessories that attach to the rail don't work with the accessories that fit the F and P cameras, if that's of interest to you.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin