Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,955   Posts: 1,586,017   Online: 670
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    James Bleifus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sonoma County, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    255
    Images
    10

    Burke and James 8X10

    I'm thinking about getting an 8X10 for 4X10 panoramic shots. One of the cameras that has caught my eye is the Burke and James which seems very affordable. Can anyone pass on their experiences? I need something rugged, reliable and affordable.

    Cheers,

    James

  2. #2
    PJC
    PJC is offline

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    35
    Rugged, reliable and affordable that's a B&J; they're built like a tank. They weigh in at about 13 lbs, but if the weight isn't a consideration it offers tremendous stability. I used an 8x10 B&J for years until I wanted something lighter and then picked up a Canham. I still have the B&J if you're interested.

    Regards, Pete

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Lobsta
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    566
    I second the motion. Use the money you save for film and paper.
    My Verito page

    Anyone can appreciate a fine print. But it takes a real photographer to appreciate a fine negative.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    1,030
    Straightforeward cameras. I had an 11x14. I don't know about the 8x10 but mine had bellows that went from here to there and back again. The only thing I didn't like were the focusing knobs that really protruded when the camera was folded, and the seperate extension rail. Not big deals really. For the money they're very good deals. I graduated to a Deardorff though. The self casing design works better for me in the field---no extension rails to misplace and no knobs way out there to foul on the foliage. Personal preference. If rugged reliable and affordable is what you want, a B&J is certainly that.

  5. #5
    roteague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Kaneohe, Hawaii
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    6,672
    Images
    18
    I know who Burke and Wills is (our Aussie members will know this one). Does that count?
    Robert M. Teague
    www.visionlandscapes.com
    www.apug.org/forums/portfolios.php?u=2235

    "A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist" -- Louis Nizer

  6. #6
    lee
    lee is offline
    lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth TX
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,913
    Images
    8
    I have a B&J 8x10 that is big and heavy and wobbly. The back falls off sometimes when I am inserting or removing the film holders. I always allow the camera to settle down from the shakes before I pull the trigger. I like the negs it makes. I think I will keep it for now.

    lee\c

  7. #7
    noseoil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,898
    Images
    17
    I use an old B&J which weighs 17# with the lens (300mm Symmar-S). It is rugged, stable and a pain in the a$$ to lug around. It is an excellent value, works well, sets up easily and does a good job.

    I made a reducing back with an old Graflok back and a used parts back. Great combination for long shots with the 300mm lens, very sharp, and wonderful to focus in 8x10 format. The original glass is still in place, but it is fairly coarse when compared to a newer typical 4x5 ground glass.

    Biggest down-side is the weight and bulk. Unless you are willing to do a bit of lifting and walking with this beast, you won't be going very far from the car to shoot. I got an old Fujinon aluminum clad video lens trunk which holds camera, film holders, lens shade, dark cloth, meter and other odds and ends too numerous to name. Add the Bogen 3051 with 3047 head (another 17#) and you have a chiropractor's dream come true.

    Too bad it takes such nice pictures!

  8. #8
    James Bleifus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sonoma County, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    255
    Images
    10
    Thanks everyone. You've given me a lot of great information.

    Cheers.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin