Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,990   Posts: 1,524,138   Online: 1099
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    stradibarrius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Monroe, GA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,382
    Images
    163
    I was curious about brands? In my other formats I do not like to go super wide. (28mm in 35mm format) is enough for me.
    On a 4x5 do 90mm lenses require a recessed lens board?
    "Generalizations are made because they are generally true"
    Flicker http://www.flickr.com/photos/stradibarrius
    website: http://www.dudleyviolins.com
    Barry
    Monroe, GA

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,641
    Images
    5
    Good Morning, Barry,

    It may depend on the camera. I use my 90mm on a Calumet CC-400 and manage without a recessed board. It is tight, however, and movements are limited. If I did a lot of architectural work, I'd probably get a recessed board.

    Konical

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brandon, Manitoba Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    318
    I can't add anything new, so I will simply share my choice with you. I chose a Caltar II N 90mm f/6.8 to fit my Shen How PTB45. It seemed like a good compromise on size, coverage, and brightness for my needs & price range. Since the Caltar lenses are rebranded, I felt I wasn't losing anything in quality. I briefly considered the Caltar II N 75mm, but it would require a recessed lens board and wide-angle bellows and limited the adjustments. I couldn't justify the additional cost. BTW I paid $317 US for the lens, lens board, caps, and wrap.
    Bob Walberg

    The fix is in!

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    164
    It doesn't matter much which brand you use - Nikon, Fuji, Schneider and Rodenstock all build excelent lenses and you will have a hard time seeing the differences in print. And in general 90 mm doesn't need recessed lensboards.
    But talking about lensboards there's something else to consider. Some of the faster versions have very large back elements that won't fit into camera's that use small lensboards - the 5.6 super-angulon XL for instance has a hard time to fit onto the technika camera's. Screwing the back element off, placing the board with the front element on the camera, take the ground glass off, screw the back element in again, and replace the ground glass, is not something you want to do every time you want to use a 90mm.
    An other thing to consider is filter size - i standardised on 67 mm for all my lf-lenses. After playing around with an 6.7 Angulon and a 8.0 SuperAngulon I settled on the 6.8 Grandagon. It is brighter then the 8.0 Super Angulon, a very sharp lens and it has more image circle then my Toyo can give... Contrast is also a little higher - but then my Grandagon is multicoated, where my Super Angulon was single coated.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    825
    Images
    42
    I have the slightly uncommon 90mm 5.6 Caltar HR (the rebadged Topcon). A big lens (77mm filters), but it will fit my Wista DX with a flat lensboard. Movements are bellows-limited, since I cannot put a bag bellows on this camera, but I wouldn't be using a wood field camera if I wanted to do a lot of architecture ( 8-) ). I am more than happy with the performance. I standardized on 77mm filters with step-up rings for the other lenses, but since I don't need many, it hasn't been a big issue.
    I feel, therefore I photograph.

  6. #16
    nick mulder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    1,204
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Huub View Post
    It doesn't matter much which brand you use - Nikon, Fuji, Schneider and Rodenstock all build excelent lenses .
    Yup, agree - you just have speed, coverage, size and cost to decide on - these factors are all interelated ...

    Someone should make a 'Choose your 90mm for 4x5" app for iPhone
    Cleared the bowel problem, working on the consonants...

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    15,951
    hey barry

    i used to have a wollensak 3 1/2" exwa f12.5 it was a tiny little lens that stopped down
    has a image circle to cover a 5x7 sheet of film. i also had a wollensak 90mm air signal corps
    raptar, and like the exwa i ran out of movements on my 4x5 camera before i ran out of image circle.

    both these lenses are probably around 100$ each ( or less ? ) ...

    the thing about lenses for large format is that there are very expensive lenses and not so expensive lenses
    and sometimes the less expensive lenses will work just fine, and in most cases stopped down they work just fine.


    good luck !
    john
    im empty, good luck

  8. #18
    Seele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    194
    I agree with most of the correspondents; how you use it and size are important factors too: if you go out in the field with camera in a backpack, the best lens is one you can physically get there!

    This aside I actually quite like the older lenses. I use the Angulon 90/6.8 a lot, and also a Super Dagor of about the same specifications. The barrel-mounted Wideangle Aristostigmat 4" is a touch longer but covers like crazy.

    But if you don't mind a more limited angle of coverage, it's worth checking out the Rodenstock Wideangle Geronar, being a much newer lens, with multi-coating and in a modern shutter it is very usable.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin